Sorry, yes, it was the worse question.
Thank you for that.
Sorry, relative to earth.
Unless you are the singularity in the center that everything is expanded from. Or in a different dimension, since He is outside of time. If one is outside of the universe capsule then there can be a relativety between the two. And if that being outside of the universe capsule, could be in a different (6 earth day speed) capsule moving at a different speed, that is allowed to jump out of that capsule and then be outside of time.
In this theory, I am not saying God experienced 6 days or was subjective to 6 days. Rather He assigned 6 days to that occurrence, by putting it in a different time capsule that 6 days occurred, and inside that capsule, is the universe capsule moving a 13.7 billion years.
Imagine a hollow black ball that is 1' dia ( the universe). It is moving in linear through space time at a speed so an atomic clock inside this ball would measure 13.7 billion years from 0 spacetime till now. And there is a clear hollow ball moving even faster in an orbit around this black ball, like an electron around an atom. This clear ball could be moving so fast, that 6 days occur on an atomic clock in this ball, while the black ball is moving so much slower, that 13.7 billion years occurred if you had an atomic clock in the black ball. And there is a being who is outside the balls not moving at all, and controlling the balls speeds before any balls existed. And at the instant the clear ball was created and started moving, He got inside it, and at that exact instant also started creating that black ball. The Being is outside of time, and the balls have different relative times.
6 days occurred to this clear ball, and since this black ball is moving so much slower, 13.7 billion years passed.
It might not be correct, but it makes perfect logical sense and is a plausible theory based on the merits time relativety.
I agree after seeing that birds were on the 5th day and land on the 6th, (since that isn't how it is fossil dated) and many other order inaccuracies I looked over, would be the thing that disproves my time warp theory, and I need to do more research on interpretations genesis.
However that order of Genesis vs. evolution (which I didn't realize in how many things I overlooked)is what invalidates my theory, not the time warp part. I withdraw my theory on the grounds that Genesis is not to be literal, but not on the grounds of time warp being flawed.
Though it is basically pointless to debate this theory anymore, it would be more like debating superman's powers or would Spiderman beat Batman. I am up for still defending that time warp is a logical theory within the realms of our laws of physics, but I no longer think this is what happened.