The problem is not so much your opinion (although I do strongly disagree with it), but the completely overblown confidence with which you state it. You are consistently dismissive of other people’s work as you make sweeping statements about evolutionary theory. As @BradKramer said, this attitude discredits you and your ideas.
If you want specific examples, here is a small selection. I have added some of my expressions of disbelief as I read your stuff:
Wait, so thousands of scientists around the world are doing stuff that is not science? A guy with a blog gets to determine what qualifies as science instead? The whole world makes more sense now.
So studies of morphological change are dismissed? Don’t bother with the scientific literature, ignoring it is much easier. Better spend your time teaching those scientists what actual science is about.
WOW. If you think that’s how biologists have gone about this… You might need to reboot your reality checker.
Touché!
It’s not useful to separate these two topics. Evolutionary theory is crucial for making sense of genetics and genetics provides strong tests of evolutionary theory.
Thanks for rejecting whole swathes of scientific work. After years of computational modelling I finally realize it is all based on… bovine feces.