You sent replies on four conversations so I will reply only to this one.
This reply of yours doesn’t make sense. I will not address.
If the definitions associated with said hypothesis are lacking, then hypotheses are not testable, hence the 150 yrs. debate after Darwin. Unlike Evolution, no one debates the electron because it is well defined by mass, charge, spin, etc. which can be verified by many.
Not a good definition. Allele frequencies change with every newborn. Example: you have 1,000 blondes in a population of 1,000,000 and one new blond baby is born. The frequency has changed. And that’s just one allele, but how many alleles do we have?
Don’t mix the two. Genetics is science because you can test. Evolution is not because you cannot test.
Population is defined as “a particular section, group, or type of people or animals living in an area or country”
spe·cies
ˈspēsēz,ˈspēSHēz/Submit
noun
1.
BIOLOGY
a group of living organisms consisting of similar individuals capable of exchanging genes or interbreeding.
I don’t see your contention. Not only that, but neither one of these are scientific definitions. there’s way too much room for interpretation. Go back to the definition of an electron - given a particle properties we can immediately identify/reject it as an electron. But whether an individual belongs to this or that population/species is always up for debate.