Another nonscientific term. How on earth do you measure “morphological change”? You just don’t understand that vague descriptions ARE NOT part of the scientific method.
Indeed, because evolution is not science. But there’s an intense philosophical debate that just included you and me.
How on earth do you know there’s no genetic change? Aren’t your genetics different from those of everyone else?
No, they do not. You will never see a serious argument about “particle” in physics unless that particle is identified by other MEASURABLE properties.
In order to measure change (evolution), you need to know the initial condition and the final condition. But everyone has different DNA in the initial condition, hence NO Baseline. True, we can estimate one allele before and after, but do you define evolution based on one or a few alleles? Another question is How much change is “Evolution”?
You say:
If so, then every new birth is evolution.
And where EXACTLY do you draw the line? I have never seen this “line”, and this is exactly what I have been asking for all along.
Here is my original position which might help you understand: http://nonlin.org/evolution/