The problem is that the quantity is too much. I do have other things to do. So, you force me to pick and choose.
Incorrect. I only object to metaphysical assumptions in the theory of truth itself.
I have no idea what you are talking about now. I am working with the definition of metaphysics as the study of the nature of reality, according to which this statement makes no sense.
Correct, which is why I see no reason to believe in any multiverse of any kind. Such ideas and speculations are on no more objective footing than ideas and beliefs about God and angels. I choose God and the angels.
No more, to be sure, than our own choice to explain it by an infinite spiritual deity.
correction… what some atheist naturalist physicists do… This is certainly not an area of accepted science demonstrable fact.
Here I shall simply refer you to an earlier post in this thread. I can also suggest that you look up the discussion of this topic in other threads: such as this one or this one or this one or this one.
Explaining the imagined positions of your characters would be your job as an author of this fictional discussion not mine.
… so you are using the word “metaphysical” as a synonym for some combination of spiritual and fictional…??? it is very confusing.