Why Aren't the Twin Locations of >100k+ ERV's (human vs. chimp) Discussed More?

alright, you guys like ‘thoughts experiments’.

so let me add one ( you will make jokes of it, but i will take the risk )

You do confirm that retroviruses have insertion preferences.

So lets say, there are 100 preferred insertion spots available in both genomes.

It is year 100,000,000 b.c.

first insertion … spot 5 is taken … another 500 years gone, spot 44 is taken … another 500 years gone… spot 7 is taken… another 500 years gone … spot 95 is taken…

Now let me refer to your lollipop-picture.

How would it look like? A random insertion pattern … would you agree?

Time flies, and 100 million of years are gone, and all the 100 spots are taken … in both genomes, because are so similar.

So, how does it look now? Same 100 spots taken in both genomes, now it looks like a common ancestry…

Of course, we assume, that human and chimp were created at the same time. Don’t forget, i am old-earth creationist.

I don’t believe that what i just demonstrated is the way it happened, but just for fun, so you can start joking…