This is gibberish! “I’m ancient near east”? What’s that even supposed to mean?
You need ancient near east studies to even know if something qualifies as “historical evidence”.
Because the source organization is demonstrably untrustworthy.
That’s the only reason I bothered to watch the video – I thought it would be fun to get an artist’s guess for once.
That was a bit offensive.
Kind of like trusting Homer Simpson as a source for particle physics.
It’s a figure of speech that communicates my confidence that I am right. I am not literally offering a guarantee. I think you know this.
Better for whom? Not better for me, I learn from my experiences and I know watching AIG videos is a waste of time and disrupts my sense of peace and equanimity.
I wasn’t attempting to critique someone’s work, I was attempting to warn people not to bother critquing it, because it will be a waste of time. This is my opinion, presented as such, and I am certainly allowed to express my opinion on the internet. An unsupported opinion will probably only be taken seriously by people who know and trust me, but that’s okay with me, because some people here do know and trust me. I don’t feel the obligation to do other people’s homework for them.
3 Likes
Don’t know if you ever saw this, but I wrote an article up once on a better source for dinosaur/dragon links.
1 Like
Cool.
No I hadn’t, but I think I’ve seen one of the shows on tv that is referenced.