I searched Google Search and no results returned. But I found a small handful of results for Google Search
I found My view of Genesis 1-2 , but it was closed nine years ago, so I wanted to continue the discussion here.
Why wouldn’t God write Genesis Chapters 1-11 with a much lower WCI (Waw Consecutive Imperfect)) count than historical narratives?
Why doesn’t Biologos have articles counter-arguing creationists about the WCI count?
Can someone give a ounter-arguments to what’s said in https://creation.com/en/articles/genesis-waw-consecutive-narrative and Is Genesis 1–11 Historical Narrative? | Answers in Genesis, and Bible Authors and a Literal Genesis | Answers in Genesis, and https://creation.com/en/articles/schrader-hebrew-professor?
If this gets marked as spam, I will remove some of the links.
I’m not saying that I believe Genesis is a historical narrative. I just have questions. Hoping it’s not ignored by Biologos.
And why is there no tag “narrative” that I can attach to a post?