Dale
(evolutionary providentialist)
May 2, 2021, 8:53pm
23
(Hey, Dan – it’s been a while. )
There is no ‘what if’ hypothetical for some. I will point to George Müller again (I have a lot lately, it seems – I don’t know if you have seen any – there are two above – here and here ) and your profession* ties in:
'Eternity’ does not have to denote sequential time. Since God is not bound or limited to time, the definition that notes “without end or beginning” fits quite well. God’s relationship to sequential time, his being timeless (or ‘timeful’), is not adequately construed by A- or B-theory. It would not be incorrect to say that he and his relationship to time is inscrutable. But we might have expected that.
Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!
Romans 11:33
This is not an idiosyncratic idea, nor is it a new one – one example:
SES – 18 Dec 19
Is God in time? This is a popular question. Does it matter? What does it mean for God to be in time or not? In this article, I will argue that the answer to this question is terribly important in maintaining a biblical and orthodox view of God. In…
(It has been mentioned here before, as well. )
It is not a problem for God’s immutability and instantaneity – his freedom from the constraints of time, either.
I like the idea that all of God’s interactions with us are through a single act, which generates the cosmos, an idea which I term the Logos principle, based on Philo of Alexandria. In this way, God can still interact with us whilst not acting at a ‘particular’ point in time.
It also suggests how he can rule over time and chance in his providence.
*Dan’s a statistician, for those who don’t know. (He’s still a statistician, for those who do. )
1 Like