I am less interested in the pseudonym commentators, and more interested in Harshman’s comments, and potentially Felsenstein if he deigns to comment. There are a couple known academics on that forum, the same ones that frequent PS, and perhaps one or two more. That being said, the pseudonym commentators can at least point out specific deficiencies in my analysis, which will be helpful. If my work makes it through a couple forums, then I’ll consider peer review.