Hello all, I have had a link provided to me that brought me to this forum. What I assume is that forum place is a sort of mixed religion/science forum place?
Well I wish to report some finding that prove Einstein to be incorrect about relativity.
I am sure you have probably had people before pass through that think they can achieve this. However my logic and ability to think is of the utmost highest level, I would say to even Godly proportions. I seem to have the ability to look at information and get to an elementary drawn conclusion of axiom values.
Ok, thank you for your reply, I am not sure of anybodies level of education on this forum, so I will have to discus some basics first. In science we have what we call the theory of relativity and special relativity by Albert Einstein. He suggested time could slow down or speed, this was later experimentally proved and is used in our GPS systems to retain synchronisation.
However in learning this information, I had questions about this information, mainly the concept of time slowing down or speeding up. To me this seemed an impossible and my findings show that this is an impossibility. Semantics and understanding time being misinterpreted on a daily basis around all the internet science forums. Now of course the science forums accuse me of being troll, they would hate their ideal world and their fake reality to crumble and fall into the sea.
Now people may look upon me to be thy anti-science, but objectively if they have it wrong, they need to put it straight.
Thy can not lie to oneself then continue to teach these lies to thy children.
So is anybody interesting in ââlisteningââ to why and how they have it wrong?
Well you start by not telling people why they are wrong. You provide an alternate theory that explains the known data better than the current theory. To begin with I would suggest you explain why your theory explains the deflection of light by the sun with more precision than general relativity. Even better would be to provide an explanation for something that doesnât fit general relativity. Which will be difficult as there are currently no known deviations from the theory.
Your next chronological position on the time-line is immediately ahead of you.
There is no space/gap in the flow of time to dilate/contract. Time can only be defined as a continuous quantifiable measurement directly proportional to change.
I am trying to keep it simple to gain your understanding, I do not know the ability of readers science information at this time.
Regardless of our âreal worldâ perception and experience, hard data has confirmed Einsteinâs predictions about time dilation. Do you have an explanation for that?
Of course I have an explanation of that, but will you understand the explanation is more of a concern than explaining. I will keep it really simple for now. Please review the logical statement and look for falsifiable statement within it . It is an axiom postulate.
OkayâŚso two clocks in two places measure time at different speeds. They both âexperienceâ time as continuous with the ânext chronological position on the time-line as immediately ahead.â SoâŚcan you explain why they seem to measure time at different speeds relative to one another?
OhâŚan time need not be separated into discrete quanta in order to dilate. A rubber band stretches without being separated into âdifferent pieces of rubberâ (at the common âreal worldâ scale).
So you have two people counting at the exact same speed finishing at different times.
You could argue that in locales of higher gravity people and things just âcount faster.â Whatâs the practical difference between that and time dilation?
Yes , science is saying that they count slower , i.e time dilation , then time slows down, So far from the truth it is quite laughable.
The true speed of time is Ît=tP
All observers using tP to measure time would experience simultaneous time. Einstein never considered time at small increments, he only thought as time as being discrete in 1 second increments, giving an amount of distance to contract that is not actually there to begin with.
Your next instant of now being only a tP away , we would have to use tP being the smallest conceivable measurement , agreeing that Newton was correct and time is absolute and can only be perceivable and explained by a mathematical expression. Ît=tP
Having read the subsequent posts, I would suspect âprobably notâ. Itâs likely there are pretty few people here that could appreciate or even understand your new theory. In presenting an idea about why relativity may be incorrect, itâs probably best to write long letters to the heads of many physics departments and ask for their comments. Thatâs been the traditional route for quite some time and it works very well.
I am simply not the traditional type of person, I spread my words by my sword, in this instant my sword is my keyboard as I a have advanced from pencils.
However when I have relative agreement all over the world, I then might decide to complete my paper and send it off for publication.