Indeed you are right, Jesus Christ is our Sabbath rest, that is why its by faith we trust in Him for our rest in the work that has already been done. But, while any day can be a day of rest no doubt; I feel the Lord’s Day should be seen as a special day of rest as in when we can for once a day cease from our secular works and rest, relax and give praise to God for all the good things He has done in our lives.
All the English translations I read it in are singular.
Entering the sabbath rest of Jesus is to give up the works of law (Moses)
Indeed. The law of Moses. The moral code, encapsulated in the two greatest commandments and also abbreviated and recorded as the Ten preceded Mosaic law. By God’s grace, we no longer need to heed the minutiae of dietary, sanitary, civil and ceremonial law.
What do you think Paul is referring to?!:
For in my inner being I delight in God’s law…
(That’s part of what I meant earlier about the distinction being implicit in the NT.)
The moral code was written in our hearts ab initio and is our conscience (which can be distorted or seared and needs an objective written code as a standard to test ourselves against).
All the English translations I read it in are singular.
That may be a big reason why the Lord’s Day of rest has fallen into disrepute, that, and the failure (demonstrated here) of failing to distinguish Mosaic law from moral law.
Moral laws are laws of love.
The laws of love are family rules established by our Father for the well-being of his children and his household, and for his honor. (If we do not desire to obey them then maybe our hearts have not been changed and we are really not part of his family.) Our old nature still clings to us, and we fail more or less often (hopefully less and less), but we should not be clinging to it!! The laws of love include ALL of the Ten Commandments, and then some, as elaborated in the New Testament.
What are the laws for? Do I still need to measure my life? Yes, but not out of fear, but because I want to please him. I want his smile and I want to honor him and not disgrace him. What do I measure it against? The law(s) of love. And where is that encapsulated? In the two greatest commandments, and less succinctly in the big Ten (yes, all of them). And of course, again, there is significant elaboration in many places in the New Testament.
What does the boyfriend or suitor do, after holding flowers behind his back while waiting for the front door to be answered, when his beloved opens it? Does he shove them in her face and say, “Here, take these! It’s my duty and I have to do this because it’s the law of love!”? No. He offers them to her, hoping for her smile.* In which instance is he obeying the law of love? Does he need to obey the law of love? Yes, if he wants to see her smile.
Do the laws of love still apply? You bet. Including the arbitrary one.
*With apologies to John Piper for my loose approximation of that analogy from his book, “Future Grace”.
Also, many modern Christians are not aware of the fact that there were other ceremonial sabbaths.
[u] Romans 7 [/u]
We are released from the penalty of disobedience to the moral law by our adoption, but if we think we are released from obedience, we are mistaken and immature.
That may be a big reason why the Lord’s Day of rest has fallen into disrepute, that, and the failure (demonstrated here) of failing to distinguish Mosaic law from moral law.
I don’t think it’s “fallen into disrepute” – I think the Church has developed more diversity in what Sabbath-keeping looks like. I’m going to go with Paul on this one. Thanks for sharing your views.
I’m going to go with Paul on this one.
Paul said “sabbaths”, plural, not Sabbath, singular. And Paul was a Jew, and we are part of the true Israel. The Lord’s Day is still the Christian Sabbath and the commandment, a law of love to our Father, is still in effect, morally. I am not condemning my brothers and sisters, and thankfully punishment is no longer a threat, but you are missing out. (Don’t blame me! )
Leaders, however, do bear responsibility.
I think the Church has developed more diversity in what Sabbath-keeping looks like.
Indeed that is true, but the Lord’s Day is kept one way or another, one may not be as conservative as me and avoid heavy secular works on Sunday but that is fine, it isn’t a salvation issue.
but you are missing out.
The Lord’s Day is a day of rest indeed and a day to plug into God and rest in His grace. I myself am chilling out and finally finishing up on a NT commentary book and enjoying the Autumn colors outside of my house.
I think there is reward to be gained in eternity, too. (I am sure I have forfeited reward in many other areas!) Seek Father’s heart.
I have a question about irony.
I still do.
Loving God means keeping his commandments, and his commandments are not burdensome.
And commerce is burdening, and a god of this age.
I think the Church has developed more diversity…
Moral diversity is ignorance or rebellion.
Sorry, I don’t see it as moral diversity.
You would be mistaken.
Paul said “sabbaths”, plural, not Sabbath, singular.
I’m afraid that doesn’t actually tell us anything. In Greek, “Sabbaths” (σαββατα) can have either singular or plural meaning, both in the New Testament and outside it. For example, in the opening of Matthew 28:1, ὀψέ σαββάτων, Sabbath is plural in form but singular in meaning.
It is the first thing recorded in scripture that he sanctifies (the first time the word “holy” is used in scripture) is the Day of Rest. (Genesis 2:3)
It is a good thing that it is not our holiness but our Lord’s that Father sees! “Make every effort to… be holy; without holiness no one will see the Lord.” Hebrews 12:14.
It is the principal one [of the Ten Commandments] that Jesus used to show the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and to get himself sacrificed for our redemption.
It is the only one that involves redemption. (Deuteronomy 5:15)
Father likes an arbitrary command or three:
- “And the Lord God commanded the man, ‘You are free to eat from any tree in the garden;
but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.’” Genesis 2:16-17.- “Then the Lord said to Moses, ‘I will rain down bread from heaven for you. The people are
to go out each day and gather enough for that day. In this way I will test them and see whether they will follow my instructions. On the sixth day they are to prepare what they bring in, and that is to be twice as much as they gather on the other days.’” Exodus 16:4-5.- The other nine of the Ten make implicit and intuitive sense in terms of loving Father and loving others, so the commandment to rest, and especially to rest on the seventh day, is effectively arbitrary compared to the others.
(Any of Father’s wishes is righteous, even if it is arbitrary. “Thus says the LORD: ‘Let not the wise man boast in his wisdom, let not the mighty man boast in his might, let not the rich man boast in his riches, but let him who boasts boast in this, that he understands and knows me, that I am the LORD who practices steadfast love, justice, and righteousness in the earth. For in these things I delight, declares the LORD.’” Jeremiah 9:23-24)
Its inclusion immediately after the massively important first part of Isaiah 58 is a good example. Something about its importance could certainly be inferred from that.
It is an enduring metaphor for grace and justification by faith: “…to the man who does not work but trusts God…” Romans. 4:5.
One important point about why the first day of the week is the Christian day of rest: that is the day when our Lord Jesus rested from what was truly work for him. Creation was “no sweat” for him in his power, so to speak, but he sweat blood and his work for our redemption was immeasurably and unspeakably more arduous, and from which he rested on the Lord’s Day.
Obedience to the commandment to rest is no longer obligatory?!
For example, in the opening of Matthew 28:1, ὀψέ σαββάτων, Sabbath is plural in form but singular in meaning.
I mean, that’s like rain on your wedding day.