Heaven on earth, heaven as some other place and heat death

[SkovandOfMitaze (Intellectually Atheist Emotionally Christian)]

What I’m trying to see if if your consistent in how you view what’s good or if you have a different sets of morality for different positions.

So you believe this universe goes away and a whole new universe is created? If so, that’s as far as my discussion needs to go. It’s why I lined out specifically for those that believe we are physically recreated back into this universe on this planet, not another.

As for morality, I already know you have a sliding scale of justice based on what species it is. It’s how yall justify animal abuse, just not for dogs but for things like chickens and pigs.

[1Cor15.54]

@SkovandOfMitaze

So you believe this universe goes away and a whole new universe is created?

Either that or a profound renovation of this universe. I see no other way. I certainly don’t think that an entropy-based universe can be compatible with the order of things there will be after the general resurrection.

[gbrooks9 (George Brooks, TE (E.volutionary T.heist OR P.rovidentialist))]

@SkovandOfMitaze

What are you doing to stand up for justice? Which mother are talking about specifically? What protests are you going too. Whose bills are you helping cover with your small donations? What number are you calling every day to leave voicemails so that the representatives have to listen to them. Or is justice just something you don’t have to participate in because we will get it as ghosts? We don’t need to chain ourselves for 2 days to old growth oak trees that are habitats for endangered birds because God will give us justice by restoring everything.

So you believe in a physical resurrection? I’ll just ask questions one at a time.

@SkovandOfMitaze

As I’ve said before …. ALL mainstream theism that invokes the triune traits of
God is All Loving,
God is All Powerful, and
God is All Knowing

share the problem of THEODICY, whether the theist is a Creationist or an
Evolutionist.

Each denomination or brand of Theodicy has its own response or solution to
the questions that circulate around Theodicy.

We are not addressing the mission by disputing how each other’s responses
to theodicy do not satisfy our own brand’s response.

G.Brooks