Heaven on earth, heaven as some other place and heat death

Just curious about in a nutshell how you envision heaven? So I know some of yall have very supernatural driven beliefs about heaven that leads to it just simply being something outside of this universe and so what happens in this universe does not matter as far as this is concerned.

As many know I learn more towards naturalism. Materialist? Sure. Since I see no evidence for anything outside of this universe and I don’t see evidence for magic within it, ultimately it’s just fallsnint the …. Not even sure what you call it. Just that without evidence, something to me is synonymous with fiction. It’s he said she said by an unknown.

So many don’t fear death. As in they are not afraid of dying. Nothing significant anyways. Some are and some find the idea of ghostly bodies roaming a world of light as peaceful. Or that we get physically resurrected into new bodies. The Bible definitely says that….. but it says all kind of stuff that just not literal. Accomondationism is the blanket I toss over everything not natural.

So even when I try to think of heaven as this magical place instead my mind still just drifts into naturalism. I think it death most often as this. My biggest fears are that I’ll die before I’m able to make plans the care for those love. I’m far more worried about my living loved ones , such as my pets and not scared of what I best see as just rest finally, sleeping forever.

So when I see my own death my thoughts go like this. I hope I have a green burial. I don’t want any chemicals in me. I don’t want to be preserved. I don’t want an expensive coffin. I don’t want to be at a cemetery or burned. I want to be buried on my property. I want to be wrapped in cloth and placed in a very decomposable cardboard coffin. I want bugs, bacteria, roots, fungi and so on to break me down. I want my body to be turned into food for other living beings. I imagine my flesh breaking down and being absorbed as nutrients by roots and fungi. That my energy and parts become pollen, flowers and fruit. That as calcium leeches from my bones they eventually become snail shells. That my body goes back to nature. That my body and the bodies of my deceased pets become food for wilderness.

Then long term I think of my molecules becoming all these things. I think of continuing as different forms. Not me as in my personality but what I’m made up off. I see even eventually potentially our sun becoming a red giant. Eventually I’m just chemicals in a dead planet that becomes fuel for a star. I’m chemical reactions as stars explode, are born and die. Internal the stars winking out as I become radiation and so on. That in 100tdillion years my energy changing again and again. Just like I was made from stars.

So when I think of heaven I think of it as myth being symbolically used as a way to see the good in the heat death. If we do become immortal beings somehow, what about the death of the universe? Are we in a dimensions outside of this?

I know no one knows, just curious what they think.

Heaven can’t be understood through a materialist lens. The Bible says that God spoke the world into existence. In John it says that Jesus is the WORD of God.

John 1:1-3: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.”

Hebrews 1:3: “He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power.”

Colossians 1:16-17: “For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth… all things were created through him and for him. And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together.”

Acts 17:28: “For in him we live and move and have our being”.

The New Testament clarifies the Old Testament. The continued existence of the universe is an ongoing act of God’s will.

You aren’t in a self-existing material world; you are existing within and by God’s words. His words are not dead like your words or my words but a living person, Jesus, his WORD.

Interestingly, modern physics with the observer effect and the fixed speed of light, scientists have started to see the universe as information.. words if you will.

This is all critical for an understanding of heaven. The spiritual world is the broader system that our physical world runs on, it is the source of it. What you see of through your senses in every moment is literally God’s word.

When we leave this world, the Bible says that we will be like the angels. We will perceive the true nature of reality, but also but also there will be a new heaven and a new earth for us to enjoy, and God will walk with us there as he once did in the garden of Eden.

I think that your views are missing a lot of hope. And I truly hope that you can understand the hope that we can have in the resurrection.

“And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth.”

Jesus came to show use that death is not the end, through his resurrection and miracles proving that he was God and that he has power over death so that we can have hope.

“He is not the God of the dead but of the living, for to him all are alive”. Luke 20:38

In the old ANE scriptures (including old biblical scriptures), Heaven was the place above the firmament while we live below the firmament. The world of humans was on Earth while Heaven was the place of heavenly beings, with the throne of God. A prayer that ‘your will be done on Earth and in Heaven’ means a hope that God’s will would happen both among humans and in the place where the heavenly beings live.

Today we know that we cannot fly to Heaven with rockets and we have abandoned the ancient ANE cosmology. If we want to preserve the ancient view of Heaven and Earth, we need to use different language. For example, N.T. Wright has used the expression ‘dimensions’: Heaven is like a dimension that we cannot see but where the heavenly (spiritual) beings live.

I read today text about eschatology and Heaven (‘I believe. Help my unbelief!’ by Veli-Matti Kärkkäinen). Kärkkäinen noted that theological reflection on heaven is ominously missing in contemporary academic theology. Kärkkäinen noted that the largest (at 36 volumes) and most prestigious theological encyclopedia, the Theologische Realenzyklopädie has no entry on ‘heaven’. Apparently, heaven is not considered to be an important concept in contemporary theology.

An exception to this apparent neglection has been Moltmann. In his work ‘Coming of God’, he devotes a section to the topic of heaven. Yet, even Moltmann focuses more on ‘new earth’ than heaven and warns about too otherwordly emphasis.

Apparently, belief in ‘heaven’ is not a critical doctrine for most Christians.

2 Likes

For me, seeing the limitations and superficiality of physical existence is pretty much the whole point of all this religious stuff. So in a sense my (methodological) naturalism and drive to the supernatural go hand and hand. This physical world we experience is definitely material (energy) and natural – governed by mathematical laws of space and time. Thus my attraction to religion is founded in an incredulity that this mathematical structure is the limit of reality. It is very much like a feeling that I am living in a computer simulation where everything is made of bits behaving according to some software programming.

That picture of existence is not life. It is a machine. And certainly not conducive to a feeling that existence is worthwhile. I demand more. Is it possible there is no more? Of course. But that possibility simply isn’t worth my time to waste any thought or action on.

Well I certainly don’t fear non-existence. That is just too irrational for me. Nothingness is nothing to fear – it is frankly, just boring. And when you choose what to occupy your mind with, that is the ultimate criticism.

For me this just a fun fantasy like star empires, wizard schools, fairies, magic swords, and worlds with talking animals. I read such books and watch such movies with great enthusiasm. But it is pure escapism – for this world (ream of existence) anyway. But I guess our vast realm of imagination is one of the reasons I find it difficult to believe the physical universe is the limit of reality. As big as the universe is (and I have thoroughly enjoyed exploring it), it is pathetically small for the reach of my mind.

I am reminded of Hamlet.

King: Now, Hamlet, where’s Polonius?

Hamlet: At supper.

King: At supper! where?

Hamlet: Not where he eats, but where he is eaten: a certain convocation of politic worms are e’en at him. Your worm is your only emperor for diet: we fat all creatures else to fat us, and we fat ourselves for maggots: your fat king and your lean beggar is but variable service, two dishes, but to one table: that’s the end.

King: Alas, alas!

Hamlet: A man may fish with the worm that hath eat of a king, and eat of the fish that hath fed of that worm.

King: What dost you mean by this?

Hamlet: Nothing but to show you how a king may go a progress through the guts of a beggar.

It is biology, and well worth some time for my mind to think about. But why should my mind stay there …in the dirt with the worms?

So… as for heaven? Heaven is about being with God. And God is spirit.

Since scientific thought has abandoned the notions of absolute space and time, I see very little reason to limit my expectations of reality to just the measures of space and time in the physical universe. And thus given the means to think of reality outside fixed measures of space and time, I can easily imagine reality going beyond them.

2 Likes

To me it’s simple, Heaven is where as indirectly indicated by Jesus as the place where others will do unto You as You have done unto them. This is the indication of the after-life, which also includes Hell, if you bring Hell then Hell will be where others will bring Hell to You.

So in the stories of Jesus resurrection, it sounds like his corpse was brought back to life, and that corpse was not more than just flesh as it was able to do things that seems outside of time and space. Such as being unrecognized by closest followers and moving through a wall possibly as he suddenly appeared in a locked room. Or maybe his body was elsewhere and he was sending visions. Like how Moses appeared at the transcendence.

When I read the Bible , and heavily influenced by scholars who say heaven comes down to earth, that heaven overlaps earth and it’s restored. They make it sound like heaven is not a dimension outside of our own always but comes back. The heaven and earth series by Tim Mackie of The Bible Project really goes into this surprised by hope a bit too by NT Wright.

So to me it seems the Bible indicates a physical resurrection but that corpses are no longer just flesh but a new flesh, spiritual I guess. But that it’s still our bodies and that heaven comes down to earth and overlaps with us. Like the new heaven and earth is better understood as the restored heaven and earth.

That’s where I get caught up. Like does the sun get restored into one that never becomes a supernova or maybe the sun does go out but it does not affect us. It’s easier to think of it as a “magical” place or using terms like a space that exists outside of time and space, I mean in the end heat death sounds a lot like a place without meaningful time or space.

I guess I personally don’t find the universe to small. If this is all there is, I don’t feel any less than if there is more I guess. I mean I hope some kind of magical existence ( by magical mean spiritual they are the same to me ) occurs after the death of these bodies. But I don’t necessarily feel sad if there is not because I still find significant peace imaging the universe with no meaningful energy in it as it reaches maximum entropy and that energy is in a state of thermodynamic equilibrium. To me it’s that same closeness I feel imaging the mostly dropped off Big Crunch.

I think heaven would be something like a dreamworld.

not sure if paradise is the same thing as heaven but:

Columbus didn’t just think he’d found new land — he thought he’d stumbled onto something biblical.

  • In his later writings (especially the Book of Prophecies), Columbus argued that parts of the New World were:

    • the Earthly Paradise

    • possibly the Garden of Eden

  • He believed Paradise was a real geographic place, elevated above the rest of the world.

  • When he explored the Orinoco River in South America, he wrote that such a massive river must be flowing out of Eden itself — straight-up Genesis logic.

1 Like

Maybe. The biblical scriptures tell surprisingly little about the life after death and also about the future world. There are several metaphores and other mental pictures but they are metaphores and mental pictures. Some persons take them very literally, just like some take Genesis 1 as a creation within six normal days. What such interpretations show is just that these persons do not know or respect the basic rules of interpretation (exegesis).

Biblical scriptures are mainly interested and focused on the life here and now. How do we live, how do we treat other humans and creation, what is our response to the will of God? There are some prophetic texts about the future but even these aim to affect how we live our life.

What happens after our death is mainly behind a curtain. We are told about resurrection and something else but much will come as a surprise. For those who are followers of Jesus, I believe that life after death will be a pleasant surprise.

And by the way, I think that burning is an ok way to treat bodies. Burning takes a bit energy and produces a small amount of CO2 but otherwise, what is left is not harmful and does not take much space. An ecologically friendly alternative.

1 Like

My wife and I have discussed cremation a bit. Ultimately, the decision centers on what our children would be best served with, not our concerns, as we are both confident that it doesn’t matter. Cremation just accelerates the oxidative process of decomposition.
I do wonder about heaven as a place where we still have cognitive ability. Jesus was resurrected with full cognition, but he was God. We change so much over time for both good and bad, it makes you wonder how that could ever be to have our experiences and memories intact from a lifetime where even those memories change with time.

1 Like

I was under the impression that you could ask for forgiveness for your sins and not face retribution for those sins. Is that not the case?

That is a good and perhaps even difficult question. Me at the age of 60 years is not the same as me at the age of 10 years. If we change that much during our life, what keeps me at 60 the same person as at 10 years? What keeps me before death the same person as me in the resurrected body?

Cells are replaced, so much of the biological body is replaced during 50 years.
Memories fade, so it cannot be just memories.
There is continuation in that me is called by the same name in the official papers but that is perhaps not a sufficient explanation if we compare the person before death vs. after resurrection.

Those who think that we have a separate eternal soul can say that the soul stays the same. I am not so sure about that idea as it seems to originate more from the pagan Greek philosophy than the Hebrew scriptures. So I have to leave that possibility an open question.

Somehow the identity is preserved from the mortal to the resurrected body but only God knows certainly how.

3 Likes

I indicated that this correlation of Jesus instruction of do unto others as you would have others do unto You is my conclusion of what the after life will be. I also asses that Your after-life can be non-existent as Jesus indicated You can perish, but if You believe in Him you won’t perish. The statement doesn’t exclude other ways to get to the after-life or where the after-life will be, as if Christianity isn’t the only Way to the after-life.

Heaven could still be located in what we call outer space or at least it occupies the same space as outer space, but we just can’t see it because its a spiritual place.

I don’t have a particular issue with cremation. I think it’s more environmentally friendly than ecologically friendly. It’s not what I want. Nor is it in my will of what I’ve prepped for. If I could do anything I would love to be left on the ground and eaten by animals. But we have to be buried so I hope it happens there. It’s less of coyotes, wolves and ants and more of microscopic life.

1 Like

there are body farms you can donate your body to where you are laid out in the elements and they let nature take its course and study the result for forensic analysis.

2 Likes

When this topic was discussed with a pastor, he moved his hand back and forth and said that it is here. Surrounding us, not far away.

1 Like

The soul is the form of the body, so I don’t see an issue on that front. Moreover, there have been millions of reported experiences worldwide of people encountering the souls of deceased loved ones — and they were unmistakably themselves.

Sure, one could argue that they were all inventions or hallucinations — but I find it hard to believe that a transcultural phenomenon of such magnitude holds no weight and can be handwaved that simplistically. By the way, I use this example assuming you’re not Catholic or Orthodox — since for members of those Churches, it’s a doctrinal truth preceding any possible life experience that souls retain their identities in the intermediate state between physical death and the final resurrection.

But if I were you, I wouldn’t worry too much about that — God knows what’s best for us. :smiling_face:

To be honest, I’m 36 now, and when I think back to my 10- or 11-year-old self, I still recognize that kid as very much me. Of course, I’ve changed in many ways since then — but I was myself back then, and I’m still myself now.

Different, of course — but it’s not as if, when I think back 25 years, I’m remembering someone else. That was me — very much me.

3 Likes

It’s not the first time I’ve read this line of reasoning—particularly the idea that fearing non-existence is irrational. But honestly, I think that perspective often comes from not fully grappling with the true implications of nothingness.

At first glance, non-existence might seem easy to accept—after all, we didn’t exist for billions of years before we were born, and we neither feared it nor missed being alive. So, if annihilation is real, it might seem like we’d simply return to that prior state of nothingness.

To quote a famous song

“I mean, what have you got to lose?
You come from nothing, you’re going back to nothing—what have you lost? Nothing.”

It sounds simple if we put it like that, right? Hell, even comforting. A cakewalk. But I believe it’s far more complicated than that.

As self-aware beings, we do understand what death means—especially if we assume it’s the end. It would mean the erasure of every feeling, relationship, memory, experience. From that perspective, a lifetime of noble sacrifices would carry no more ultimate value than decades spent in apathy or self-indulgence. Or even full blown evil.

I find it hard to understand how such a worldview could be anything but terrifying.

In such a scenario, there’s no ultimate meaning, no deeper purpose. Love, courage, justice—reduced to chemical events in a cold, indifferent cosmos. The worst atrocities and the greatest acts of virtue would share the same final outcome. Someone who lived selflessly and died young would be lost forever, while others who lived with cruelty might live long, untouched lives (just like Jimmy Savile for example; whose crimes only came to public knowledge after his death when he was 85, and before his death he lived a long and fulfilling and respected life)—and none of it would ultimately matter.

I recognize that some people genuinely find this view comforting. I don’t question their sincerity or intelligence. But I struggle to grasp how that comfort is possible. I simply can’t fathom it; it goes beyond me.

Because to me, a universe without meaning would be the greatest horror imaginable. Worse than any atrocity in history, because without transcendent meaning or justice, even those horrors are just random suffering with no hope of redemption. It would be worse than Shoa, or child trafficking, or any horror in the universe put together and mulltiplied a trillion of times.

This is a deeply personal conviction, and I know it won’t resonate with everyone—but I stand by it:
a meaningless universe would not be worth living in. Or at the very least, I couldn’t understand how one could endure it without being constantly high as a kite and/or drugged outta his/her mind. If there’s no ultimate purpose, why stay sober? Why face the fact that children die for no reasons while evil people live long and fulfilling lives only to end up the same way? Why face the fact that our loved ones who died are nothing more than a pile of decomposing meat? What would be the point to it? What should we make of Hitler’s henchmen who died at 93 years of age while a child gets cancer and dies innocent?

If love is just a byproduct of biology, no more meaningful than a sneeze—what then? No thank you, I’d nope out of this shitshow.

1. Friedrich Nietzsche

“What does nihilism mean? That the highest values devalue themselves. The aim is lacking; ‘why?’ finds no answer.”
The Will to Power (1901), §2, p. 9


2. Emil Cioran

“It is not worth the bother of killing yourself, since you always kill yourself too late.”
The Trouble with Being Born (1973), p. 10


3. Arthur Schopenhauer

“Human life must be some kind of mistake.”
Studies in Pessimism (1851), essay: “On the Sufferings of the World”, p. 43


4. Albert Camus

“There is but one truly serious philosophical problem, and that is suicide. Judging whether life is or is not worth living amounts to answering the fundamental question of philosophy.”
The Myth of Sisyphus (1942), Introduction, p. 3


5. Lev Shestov

“Reason is the enemy of life.”
All Things Are Possible (1905), p. 67


6. Jean-Paul Sartre

“Every existing thing is born without reason, prolongs itself out of weakness, and dies by chance.”
Nausea (1938), p. 133 (English translation)


7. Thomas Ligotti

“Consciousness is an existential liability.”
Source: The Conspiracy Against the Human Race (2010), p. 21

I would find their position entirely valid—if the universe were truly devoid of meaning and materialism held truth.

1 Like

I agree with that.

Contrary to what @1Cor15.54 seemed to fear, this is not the same as life without meaning. Biblical scriptures promise a resurrection and new life, so I guess that will happen. But even if there would be nothingness for me, I am on the ‘Jesus road’. Jesus bought me free and I want to live as a follower of Jesus no matter what happens to me after the death.

The promises of God are both for the current life and the life that hopefully comes after the resurrection. Even without the latter, being with God is worth everything.

2 Likes

I can understand that, just let me point out that the Bible itself attests that if there was no afterlife and resurrection then even our belief in Jesus would be worthless and meaningless.

1 Cor 15,13-19: If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised. And if Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith. More than that, we are then found to be false witnesses about God, for we have testified about God that he raised Christ from the dead. But he did not raise him if in fact the dead are not raised. For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised either. And if Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins. Then also who have fallen asleep in Christ are lost. If only for this life we have hope in Christ, we are of all people most to be pitied. If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus for merely human reasons, what have I gained? If the dead are not raised, "Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.”

1 Cor 15,29-32: Now if there is no resurrection, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized for them? And as for us, why do we endanger ourselves every hour? I face death every day—yes, just as surely as I boast about you in Christ Jesus our Lord. If I fought wild beasts in Ephesus with no more than human hopes, what have I gained? If the dead are not raised, “Let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die.”

The Bible is pretty straightforward. According to the Bible, the value of following Jesus lies in the fact that He is God in the flesh, who died for us and conquered death on our behalf. Or He would be just one of the many good men to live on this earth.

Also, I don’t fear materialism any more than I fear the Baba Jaga (Honestly, I think the Baba Jaga might be more plausible than materialism. :joy:)—I was simply pointing out what I see as the logically unavoidable consequences of annihilation, if it were real. I know that many people claim to find meaning even in the prospect of annihilation, but to me, that seems nonsensical—oxymoronic, even (as I don’t think that meaning can be created, only discovered. Or at the very least if you create a meaning out of thin air you should at least be able to delude yourself into believing that it’s not entirely created because believing that you can create true meaning in a truly meaningless universe is an oxymoron of the highest caliber, self-deception at its absolute finest). And I suspect that the vast majority of those people still hold onto at least a sliver of hope, tucked away somewhere. I’m highly skeptical of the human mind’s ability to truly grasp and accept the full consequences of annihilation without descending into utter despair and madness (if assumed to be true).