You are wrong. Step 1 in the scientific method is to reject a theory immediately if it is in conflict with natural laws. This first step protects science spilling energy on nonsense. Your theory: “Mutations can produce mutation repair systems” is such nonsense, because oxidation cannot produce reduction.
You are wrong. The Miller-Urey experiments proves that a (simple) factory must be built to produce an ever growing amount of amino-acids. Before you make a reply, please read the following information and learn that you have been deceived by Miller, Urey and your teachers of evolution.
In 1953 PhD student Stanley Miller set out to prove that natural processes can transform basic organic substances into amino acids in an ever higher concentration. To this end, he took a glass flask with two inwardly projecting electrodes between which he could make sparks stagger and filled the flask with water, methane, ammonia and carbon dioxide. Indeed he found that the artificial lightning in his simulation of a primitive earth atmosphere could produce amino acids. But he also found that the concentration of building block in the flask did not increase ever further, because new sparks destroyed the building blocks that were initially formed; the larger the faster. Instead of reporting that natural processes are not able to produce an ever concentrated primordial soup, he attached a transport mechanism to the lightning flask, to transfer the building blocks that were produced to a second flask where they would be safe for destruction. In fact, Miller built a primitive amino acid factory, with which he succeeded to produce an ever more concentrated ‘primordial soup’. Miller claimed his adjusted test set proved that natural processes could have produced billions of tons of building blocks for life in the primordial oceans. Instead, Miller’s experiments prove that an ever more concentrated soup of amino acids cannot arise by natural processes, but demands the building of a factory. Based on the false claims of Miller and his supervisors, it is broadly believed today that organic molecules possess an intrinsic, hidden desire to organize themselves spontaneously into increasingly larger structures. This view on matter is a repetition of the Alchemist’s view, who believed that matter does not merely consist of four basic elements (water, fire, air and earth) but also contains a hidden force (the ‘quint essence’). Many people believe that if we search long enough, this hidden force will be discovered and after triggering it in the right way, it can be released, resulting into a natural process in which organic molecules will transform themselves into increasingly larger and more complex structures. As a consequence, energy would become available for free and the chemical industry would become useless.
The physical differences between chimps and humans are caused by differences in their DNA. These differences are found both in the parts that code for proteins and in the other parts, which appear to be functional as well and are not junk as Darwinists and Naturalists still believe. The progress of science has dismissed this belief to the domain of fairy tales. See: ENCODE, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements at: https://www.encodeproject.org/. ENCODE makes clear that the DNA is a book, made up of chapters, paragraphs, sentences, words, and letters. Please educate yourself.
Indeed, opposed processes can happen simultaneously. But they cannot produce one another.
- The chemical processes in every cell obey the laws of chemistry and logic.
- Theories that are in conflict with natural laws an logic, like “Mutations can produce mutation repair systems”, must be removed from the domain of science and be transported to the domain of ‘illogical Dark Ages beliefs’.
Dear George, T-aquaticus and Jonathan,
1. Either of you is convinced that organic molecules possess the magical property of spontaneous self-organization, which allows them to form increasingly complex structures with an increasingly higher energy level. This pre-Victorian alchemist faith is diametrically in conflict with empirical science. Molecules possess the natural property of spontaneous disintegration. Natural physical processes are decay processes. The production of increasingly complex structures with an increasingly higher energy level requires the building and running of a factory, as Miller and Urey have demonstrated.
2. Your opinion that mutations can produce mutation repair systems is an illogical Dark Ages belief.
(Notice that the belief that DNA mutation repair systems are created by a transcendental creator, is a rational belief, because all repair systems we know, for instance of cars, houses, cloths, text files, health, and relationships, are created by a creator.)