3 Egyptian Inscriptions About Israel

Three Egyptian Inscriptions About Israel
In the Bible there are numerous interactions between the Israelites and the Egyptians. Such interactions can be seen in three Egyptian inscriptions that clearly refer to the Hebrew people.

1. The Soleb Inscription

At the end of the 15th century B.C., the Egyptian Pharaoh Amenhotep III built a temple to honor the god Amun-Ra at Soleb in Nubia (modern-day northern Sudan). Within the temple area are a series of columns on which Amenhotep III listed the territories he claimed to have conquered. Each territory is listed by a relief of a prisoner with their hands tied behind their backs over an oval “name ring” identifying the land of the particular foe. The most interesting from a biblical perspective is a column drum that lists enemies from the “the land of the Shasu (nomads) of Yahweh”. Given the other name rings nearby, the context would place this land in the Canaanite region. In addition, the prisoner is clearly portrayed as Semitic, rather than African-looking, as other prisoners in the list are portrayed.1 Two conclusions are almost universally accepted: this inscription clearly references Yahweh in Egyptian hieroglyphics (the oldest such reference outside of the Bible), and that around 1400 B.C. Amenhoteph III knew about the god Yahweh. Moreover, it would indicate an area in Canaan in the 15th century B.C. inhabited by nomadic or semi-nomadic people who worship the god Yahweh.

This inscription is also evidence that points to an early date for the exodus. According to a literal reading of 1 Kings 6:1, Solomon began building the temple in the 480th year after the people of Israel came out of the land of Egypt, placing the exodus around 1446 B.C. Moreover, when Moses first went to Pharaoh to deliver God’s message to let His people go, Pharaoh responded by saying, “Who is the LORD, that I should obey his voice and let Israel go? I do not know the LORD, and moreover, I will not let Israel go” (Ex. 5:2). By around 1400 B.C., when the Israelites would have been nearing the end of the conquest of Canaan, the ruling Egyptian Pharaoh does know about Yahweh. Egyptologist, Dr. Charles Aling and historian Dr. Clyde Billington summarize: “If the Pharaoh of the Exodus had never before heard of the God Yahweh, this strongly suggests that the Exodus should be dated no later than ca. 1400 BC because Pharaoh Amenhotep III had clearly heard about Yahweh in ca. 1400 BC.”2

2. The Merneptah Stele

In 1208 B.C. Pharaoh Merneptah erected a 10-foot tall victory monument (called a stele) in a temple at Thebes to boast of his claims to victory in both Libya and Canaan. Of Merneptah’s Canaanite campaign we read:

Israel is wasted, its seed is not;

And Hurru (Canaan) is become a widow because of Egypt.3

Despite Merneptah’s boast of having destroyed Israel, we know from history that this did not happen. The Bible makes no mention of this attack. It seems to have been a relatively small military campaign, taking only three cities and then boasting of Israel being laid waste. For comparison, when Pharaoh Shishak invaded Israel he recorded the names over 180 cities/places he claims to have conquered. Even though this seems to have been a small military operation the Merneptah inscription is of huge importance to biblical archaeology.

Most scholars agree that this is the oldest definitive reference to Israel as a nation outside of the Bible, and certainly the clearest Egyptian reference to Israel.4 It is also important because it too points towards an early date for the exodus (ca. 1446 B.C.) and not the late date that some scholars hold to (ca. 1270 B.C.). It is doubtful that there would be enough time from 1270 B.C. to 1208 B.C. to account for the exodus, the 40 years of wandering in the desert, the seven-year conquest of Canaan, the settlement of the tribes in their territories, and the establishment of a national presence in the land, all before Merneptah claims to have conquered them. Merneptah’s Canaanite campaign instead likely dates to the time of the Judges, when the nation of Israel was already settled in Canaan.

3. The Shishak Inscription

In 925 B.C. Pharaoh Shishak, identified as Shoshenq I, swept through Israel and Judah conquering city after city. The Bible describes this campaign in 2 Chr. 12:2-4:

In the fifth year of King Rehoboam, because they had been unfaithful to the LORD, Shishak king of Egypt came up against Jerusalem with 1,200 chariots and 60,000 horsemen. And the people were without number who came with him from Egypt—Libyans, Sukkiim, and Ethiopians. And he took the fortified cities of Judah and came as far as Jerusalem.

When he returned, he had a relief carved at the temple complex of Amun-Ra at Karnak, listing the 180+ cities he claims to have conquered. While Jerusalem itself is not named, numerous Israelite and Judahite cities are, including Beth-Shemesh, Gibeon and Megiddo, as well as places called “the fields of Abraham,” and the “highlands of David.” In fact, the remains of a victory stele set up by Pharaoh Shishak has been discovered at Megiddo.

The biblical text goes onto record that Shishak took away the treasures of the house of the LORD and the treasures of the king’s house. He took away everything. He also took away all the shields of gold that Solomon had made (1Ki 14:26). Since Jerusalem in not named in the toponym list, scholars have suggested that it was spared when King Rehoboam capitulated to Shishak paying a ransom of the treasures from the temple.5

One interesting note about the Shishak invasion is that when his son, Osorkon I became Pharaoh, he gave 383 tons of gold and silver as a gift to the temples of Egypt. He also buried his son Sheshonq II in a coffin made of pure sliver. Some have suggested that all of this wealth came from his father Shishak’s campaign into Canaan and that this gold and silver may have come from the Temple in Jerusalem and from the other cities in Judah and Israel that he conquered.6

Summary

Each of these inscriptions confirm Israel’s existence as a people group in the land of Canaan at the time the Bible describes. They act as external witnesses to the historicity of the biblical text.

Bonus Inscription:

The Berlin Pedestal is yet another Egyptian inscription that almost certainly references Israel. I highly recommend Dr. Bryant Wood’s article on this artifact, and the implications it has.

Endnotes:

1 Joel Kramer, The Oldest Yahweh Inscription. http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2017/01/20/The-Oldest-Yahweh-Inscription.aspx (Accessed February 2, 2019)

2 Charles Aling and Clyde Billington*, The Name Yahweh in Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts.* http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2010/03/08/The-Name-Yahweh-in-Egyptian-Hieroglyphic-Texts.aspx (Accessed February 2, 2019)

3 Gary Byers, “Great Discoveries in Biblical Archaeology: TheMerneptah Stele,” Associates for Biblical Research, Great Discoveries in Biblical Archaeology: The Merenptah Stela (Accessed February 2, 2019)

4 Gary Byers, Great Discoveries in Biblical Archaeology: The Merneptah Stela. Home (Accessed February 3, 2019)

5 David E. Graves, Shishak I Inscription. Biblical Archaeology: Bonus 33 - Shishak I Inscription (Accessed February 3, 2019)

6 Bryant Wood, What evidence has been found of the Egyptian king, Shishak? What evidence has been found of the Egyptian king, Shishak? (Biblical personages in archaeology) - ChristianAnswers.Net (Accessed February 3, 2019)
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A visual of the cartouche as it appears in Egyptian hieroglyphic inscriptions.

The form tꜣ šꜣsw Yhwꜣ (“land of the Shasu of Yahweh”) appears most famously on a column base at Soleb, a temple of Amenhotep III (14th c. BCE). The cartouche encloses the place name among other “enemies of Egypt.”

The hieroglyphs look roughly like this (in Manuel de Codage transliteration):

tꜣ : X1 (bread loaf, “land”)
šꜣsw : š (pool sign) + ꜣ (reed shelter) + sw (lasso man sign) = “Shasu (nomads)”
Yhwꜣ : reed + twisted flax + chick + quail chick (phonetic spelling of Y-h-w-ꜣ)

ChatGPT Image Aug 25, 2025, 01_43_25 AM-1 100% 75% 50%

4 Likes

One project in a Hebrew course was translating (from facsimiles) texts from ostraca (notes written on broken pieces of poetry) recovered from a number of archaeological sites. There was a whole set that came from the time of this campaign, messages from fortified outpost after fortified outpost that they were being overrun. From the names of some of the outposts we recognized that Pharoah Shoshenq counted anything fortified that had anyone living in it as a “city”.

5 Likes

Good stuff! Just a comment here:

This does not suggest that:

Surely Pharaoh had heard that Israel had their own God. He is just saying that Yahweh is not his god. “Who is the LORD” means, ‘what authority does He have?’ and “I do not know the LORD” means, ‘I don’t have any relationship with Him… not my god so I’m not doing what He says.’

Also information would be passed down from previous Pharaoh’s. Joseph told him about God and also interaction with Abraham before that.

Typical exaggeration by rulers to make themselves look good. :joy:

  • Pharaoh wasn’t saying he had never heard of Israel’s God. In the ancient Near East, rulers knew each people had its own god. His words in Ex. 5:2 mean, “What authority does Yahweh have over me? He’s not my god, so I don’t owe Him obedience.” As Egypt’s divine king, Pharaoh would see himself above the gods of lesser nations, and to acknowledge Yahweh’s command would mean recognizing a higher authority than Egypt’s gods — and than himself.

  • The same attitude shows up in Egyptian records: Pharaohs often exaggerated victories (like Shoshenq counting any fortified place as a “city”), using dismissive rhetoric to reinforce their supremacy. Pharaoh’s response in Exodus fits that same pattern of royal bravado.

2 Likes

Amenhotep III is not really well supported. Whilst the evidence above is a possible fit, there is more evidence against it being during his reign.

One thing we must remember, the bible very clearly tells us that Jacob did not go down to Egypt as a result of conquest, he went of his own accord to live with his long lost son Joseph, who is stated to be the second in charge of Egypt. The Bible clearly says that the pharaoh gave his blessing for Jacob and his family to reside in Goshen (a very fertile and rich area in Egypt at that time)

The theological problem is that the biblical narrative simply does not agree with Amenhotep III claiming the Israelites were an established nation at that time in history, whom he conquered.

That is not to say that Amenhotep III did not invade Canaan at some point during his reign, believed to have been around the 14th century BC; however, it does not fit the biblical narrative timeline for a nation of Israel. They would not have been anything other than an extremely small tribe at that time [edit…the time of Joseph]

Now it could be that Amenhotep falsified his conquests and added the sudden “redesignation” of immigrants to “conquered slaves” to his achievements; that is certainly a possibility, and I would agree that it is a possible fit for the claim there.

Anyway, below are a few pros and cons

2 Likes

I always thought it odd that the pharaoh was not named, since other pharaohs were named elsewhere in the Bible, but on reflection, since the pharaoh was considered a god, not naming him was consistent with Genesis 1 where the sun and moon are also not named, presumably because those names were also names of gods.

In pondering why the Israelites spent the time in slavery, I think this is a very strong clue, along with the rather scathing summary given in Genesis 47:13-25, which includes the statement,

“The land became Pharaoh’s, **21 **and Joseph reduced the people to servitude,[c] from one end of Egypt to the other.”

We see that that Jacob and family abandoned the promised land given to him by God, to live the easy life in Egypt, and thus chose a life leading to slavery and sin, much as we choose ease, material things, and worldly power over the promises of God and become enslaved by those things.

2 Likes

That’s not a theological problem, it’s an interpretive one.

It’s long, but you should watch this: Patterns Of Evidence - Exodus : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

(I recommend watching it at 1.2 times the usual playback speed if you have that option.)

edit: don’t be dismayed by the given length – the documentary itself is followed by 40 minutes of credits plus supplementary material

2 Likes

I’ve often wondered if there’s any evidence of an increase in the absoluteness of the pharaoh’s power at some point given how much more power Genesis indicates royal power was increased by Joseph.

Yet by ‘sending’ Joseph ahead and influencing events, it seems God planned that “detour”.

One could regard the time in Egypt as like being in an incubator, a place for Israel to multiply without having to worry about enemies at every turn – before, their “armies” were counted in hundreds; after, in the thousands, so before almost any king could be a threat while after there were no significant foes in Canaan.

1 Like
  • Holy moley!

That might be difficult to differentiate from other causes of changes, given that he appears to have been active during or soon before the Hyksos rule.

Heh.. I just watched it again, and was reminded that one of the things I like about it is that it brings up the fact that Egyptian chronology is . . . a mess because if it is strictly adhered to it makes nonsense out of the archaeology of surrounding cultures/peoples. That’s something scholars have been tiptoeing around for longer than I can recall; it was happening when I was in grad school and at some point there will have to be a reckoning.

2 Likes

Is there actually a difference?

im watching this documentary…its an interesting one. I habe purchased the 4 dvd combo pack

I note something in the doco which i am aware of regarding ancient egyptian timelines. The video raises the two differing time periods for the time of the Israelites in Egypt…the evidence seems to place them during an earlier reign (about 400 years earlier).

David Downs (SDA minister) raised this very issue many years ago in his video series on Egypt - “Digging up the Past”" https://www.youtube.com/@AM5743

I think that what we see from watching this documentary is that it demonstrates that the evidence we have, whilst circumstantial, is very strongly in favour of the story being true history, we just are not able to corroborate the exact dating outside of the Biblical story. But i think that means that what we can demonstrate is that if external evidence supports the claim that Israelites were in Egypt at some point around that time in the ancient past, then its almost certain that the timeline the bible presents is reasonable.

I think that the criticisms of the Admonitions Papyrus are very weak…this ancient writing clearly mirrors the Exodus plagues and it is far more than a made up story from its writer…the parallels are uncanny:

What we actually find is that the scholars who claim zero evidence, these scholars are dating the time of the exodus in the last Bronze Age and not the Middle Bronze Age. The problem is, the bible itself does not claim late Bronze Age…its claims about 1450 B.C…hundreds of years earlier in the Middle Bronze Age. The bible timeline actually comes very close to the archaeological evidences that indicate the Plagues of Egypt, Exodus, Conquest of Canaan, and the invasion of Egypt by the Hyksos!

When we look at the evidence for the destruction of the city of Jericho and the time period…jars with grain in them suggesting a spring time event, short seige, evidence of fire that is after the collapsing of walls of the city, i think we have almost irrefutable evidence for the Exodus and Conquest of Canaan when we also add in the destruction of this city.

1 Like

I has been a long time since I viewed the video (it has been discussed on this forum since not long after it came out in 2014), but why would jars with grain suggest spring time? Jars would contain grain from after the harvest in the summer until it was consumed.

3 Likes

Yes – one is just chronology, or rather two chronologies and how they fit . . . no theology involved.

IIRC it was a matter of how much grain. Presumably jars right after the harvest would be full and there would be many of them whereas in spring there would be less and fewer.

2 Likes
  • Personally, my money is on Thutmose III.
  • Here’s my collection of tidbits:
      1. Thutmose I
      1. Thutmose II
      • Thutmose II was the fourth pharaoh of the Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt, and his reign is thought to have lasted for 13 years, from 1493 to 1479 BC (Low Chronology), or just 3 years from around 1482 to 1479 BC. Little is known about him, and he is overshadowed by his father Thutmose I, half-sister and wife Hatshepsut, and son Thutmose III. There are relatively few monuments that refer to Thutmose II. Thutmose II was son of Thutmose I and his secondary wife, Mutneferet. Reign is believed to have been from about 1493 to 1479 BC.
      • 2.a. Half-sister & Wife: Hatshepsut
        • Died: January 16, 1458 BC. Daughter of Thutmose and Ahmose, Thutmose I’s primary wife.
      1. Thutmose III
      • Stepson of Hatshepsut, two years old when his father died about 1493. His stepmother Hatshepsut reigned in his place until her death in 1458.
      • Officially, Thutmose III ruled Egypt from his coronation on 28 April 1479 BC at the age of two until his death on 11 March 1425 BC. But for the first 22 years of his reign, he was coregent with his stepmother and aunt, Hatshepsut, who was named the pharaoh.[8] He became sole ruler after Hatshepsut’s death in 1458.
      1. Amenhotep II
      1. Thutmose IV
      1. Amenhotep III
      • The temple at Soleb was built by the Egyptian Pharaoh Amenhotep III in the 14th century BC (circa 1390–1350 BC) in Nubia, now part of Sudan, to honor the god Amun-Re and himself. The temple complex is famous for its classical New Kingdom structure and its inscription mentioning the name Yahweh, which is the earliest known reference to the God of Israel,
      1. Amenhotep IV/Akhenaten
      1. Tutankhamun
1 Like

Seems kind of pointless to try to figure out the season from jars of grain. There could be less and fewer because of a poor harvest, or the grain market was up and people sold their surplus, or a surge of new residents came in and ate the grain, or raiders came through and stole the grain, or a plague of locust ate the crop, etc. etc.

Or it could be the most logical answer…the city was attacked, demolished, then set on fire within a very short period of time after the spring harvest.

The significant thing is not that a few people have large quantities of grain…its that a significantly large portion of citizens had significant quantities of grain stored…that is almost certainly because it was at harvest time, and that is consistent with the bible narrative regarding when Jericho was attacked and conquered.

For me it doesnt really matter where the exodus falls in the timeline, i find this Egypt stuff fascinating and ive learned a lot as a result.