With the film “ Christspiracy “ coming out tomorrow was wondering about something. Luke 24:41-43 honeycomb debate

The film coming out is a film that actually focuses on one of the questions that has bothered me the most about the story of Jesus. A being who is potentially the incarnation of a god of love and justice , how could he kill and eat animal knowing that it’s going to suffer and die. So my question is about the various statements around Luke 24:41-43 and should honeycomb have been included, and if so, would the took it refer to it and the rest refer to fish given to the apostles. This link touches up on this specific debate.

greek - Why is the word "honeycomb", in Luke 24:42, missing from most Bible translations? - Biblical Hermeneutics Stack Exchange.