There have been long and arduous debates here about YEC vs Old Age Earth. It seems that the main debate rages around two main issues…The uniformitarian view that science must be right and, YEC claim the Bible is self-evident and the ultimate source of all authority.
The uniformitarians claim that Mosaic writings must be allegorical, YEC state the historical biblical genealogies make the uniformitarian view impossible. So what we end up with is a debate over the one spot where a gap may exist…Gen 1:1-2.
Personally, there is much evidence to illustrate the Bible as an intrinsically consistent compilation of writings supported by loads of external archeological and historical evidence. One would expect that the two sides agree on that part and yet it appears to be at the very core of the divide between them, how one interprets the reading without ripping the pages that dissagree with our fundamental beliefs out of it.
Anyway, i notice that in many debates, both sides stare at each others apparent blindness to the reality of the evidence before them, each interpreting differently but not understanding how the opposition cannot (indeed willnot) see what they see.
The irony of this for me is that, whilst Pascals Wager is scoffed at by atheists and agnostics, in most things in life choices do tend to be binary…politics would seem to be for many a laughable point and example. Anyway…
The YEC dogma* i think is summed up in a quotation from a former Columbian University President. I came across an article this morning which i thought would help explain to Old Age uniformatarianism proponents, why it is that YEC are set in our ways…
“It is indeed a grand conception which regards the Deity as conducting the work of his creation by means of those all pervading influences which we call the forces of nature; but it leaves us profoundly at a loss to explain the wisdom or the benevolence which brings every day into life such myriads of sentient and intelligent beings, only that they may perish on the morrow of their birth. But this is not all. If these doctrines are true, all talk of creation or methods of creation become absurdity; for just that certainly as they are true, God himself is impossible…
Much as I love truth in the abstract, my hope of immortality still more; and if the final outcome of all the boasted discoveries of modern science is to disclose to men that they are more evanescent than the shadow of the swallow’s wing up on the lake give… me then, I pray, no more science. Let me live on, in my simple ignorance, as my fathers lived before me, and when I shall at length be summoned to my final repose, let me still be able to fold the drapery of my couch about me, and lie down to pleasant, even if they be deceitful, dreams.” Fredrick A.P. Barnard, a mathematician and president of Columbia University in late 19th century
*dogma - a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true