Why Aren't the Twin Locations of >100k+ ERV's (human vs. chimp) Discussed More?

Yes I know. It’s quite obvious when ERVs get there via one of two methods (either common descent or seperate lineage insertions). We discussed quite extensively a paper by Yohn et. al. from 2005 that let us know that:

  • When there is a viral infection of this nature that infects two populations independently, you might see less than 5% in the same spot in the genome.

  • In humans and chimpanzees, there are 203,000 ERVs and less than 300 are in different spots… meaning that we see 99.86% in the same spot. This cannot be explained by separate viral infections and the most parsimonious explanation by a long shot is common descent.

(note going to move this over to the other thread so as not to go on a rabbit trail from this new paper you are discussing)

1 Like