If you feel the story of Jonah is historical, then I see no option but to accept that he was either miraculously preserved in the fish belly, or that “swallowed by a fish” is a part of the story that perhaps is metaphorical or (horrors!) perhaps having lost something in translation and repetition in that the sea is seen as “chaos” and the realm of monsters in Genesis and Job particularly, and we speak today such phrases as being “in the belly of the beast” or being “swallowed by the sea.” I really see no biblical indication of resurrection except indirectly as the story is metaphorically applied to Jesus, and there, whether historical or metaphorical in the original telling, it is metaphor with the limitations thereof.