The author of this concordist channel https://www.youtube.com/@thehebrewofisrael believes that Abraham belonged to haplogroup E1b, which he generally considers to be the haplogroup of Shem.
Without going into a rehash of his arguments (e.g., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eElACF3foQ), I’ll note that I’m not convinced. He believes that Shem = Semitic languages. But in fact, “Semitic languages” is a late academic term, coined in the late 18th century by the historian Schlözer, and even then it was criticized because the Canaanites also spoke languages of this group.
The author somehow fails to note that all other speakers of Afro-Asiatic languages are clearly attributed by the Bible to the descendants of Ham—the Cushites (Kush), the Berbers (Puth), and the Egyptians (Mitzraim). That Shem’s other descendants—Elam, Lud—didn’t speak Semitic at all. That Hebrew is called Canaanite in the Bible.
And the author’s attempts to Indo-Europeanize haplogroup J are, to put it mildly, far from scientific, as far as I understand Indo-European studies. Although J certainly influenced IE (my humble opinion on this is below).
Therefore, I would rather associate E1b with Canaan (even the affinity with Africa is confirmed), and Shem with J1 (more broadly, IJ). Let us remember that haplogroup E is used as a marker of Phoenician migrations. This, incidentally, would explain why the god El isn’t reconstructed for Afro-Asiatic religion and is almost never reconstructed for Proto-Semitic religion. (However, a figure similar to El— Dyeus phater—is present on the other side of the Caucasus, among Indo-Europeans born at the junction of Eastern European hunter-gatherers with P1 and Caucasian hunter-gatherers with J1 and J2.) Moreover, afaik, E1b are mostly farmers, and J1 are rather nomads (if not, correct me!), and the Old Testament ethos is precisely nomadic, pastoral, and distrustful of farmers.
The limitations of my model:
- an ancient legend that Adam’s language was Semitic (Hebrew? Aramaic?). Of course, this could be pure apocryphal.
- Igor Dyakonov believed that the myth of Adam is reconstructed for the Afro-Asiatic era.
- it seems that analogs of the creator god, although not named El, are found in Afro-Asiatic religions.