@Ashwin_s,
I don’t understand that sentence at all. Who are you to delcare that God would or would not be involved?
While you are fussing about what typology should be applied to the very first living things ever … you seem to forget why you are in the swamp.
At some point you were pontificating on why Evolution could not be qualified as requiring the participation of God and you even started dragging in the topic of materialism. Please, once again, see the Mission Statements as published by BioLogos:
[Unlike you, @Ashwin_s, BioLogos is willing to separate Natural from Miraculous]
[6] We believe that God typically sustains the world using faithful, consistent processes that humans describe as “natural laws.” Yet we also affirm that God works outside of natural law in supernatural events, including the miracles described in Scripture. In both natural and supernatural ways, God continues to be directly involved in creation and in human history.
[BioLogos rejects Materialism and Scientism.]
[7] We believe that the methods of science are an important and reliable means to investigate and describe the world God has made. In this, we stand with a long tradition of Christians for whom Christian faith and science are mutually hospitable. Therefore, we reject ideologies such as Materialism and Scientism that claim science is the sole source of knowledge and truth, that science has debunked God and religion, or that the physical world constitutes the whole of reality.
[BioLogos accepts Evolution with Common Descent, but rejects Evolution when defined without purpose.]
[9] We believe that the diversity and interrelation of all life on earth are best explained by the God-ordained process of evolution with common descent. Thus, evolution is not in opposition to God, but a means by which God providentially achieves his purposes. Therefore, we reject ideologies that claim that evolution is a purposeless process or that evolution replaces God.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[content removed by moderator]
When someone wants to reject Evolution because it is in error, but also reject “Corrected Evolution” because it contradicts “the very same scientists that you say are in error” - - there’s not much point in discussing it again and again every 24 hours… regular as a time piece or pendulum…
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
You’ve bled me dry, @Ashwin_s. Hope your next victim has more stamina…