How about you let me know what your claims are- in various threads your main points have been:
- Evolution/common descent are not falsifiable
- Cladograms and the ‘tree of life’ are fairy tales
- Natural selection makes no predictions and is tautology
- Evolutionary Creationism is an oxymoron because evolution by definition is ‘unguided’ which is different from every other branch of science somehow
- The appendix is not vestigial and neither is anything else
- Whale fossils are arbitrarily arranged in their cladograms to trick people
- Thermodynamics paper by Biologic Institute highlights how the second Law still defeats abiogenesis and the theory of evolution
- A few more things on convergent evolution and the third way folks as part of your argument against common descent
If I missed anything, please let me know. Or if you have better thread titles you’re certainly welcome to either PM me what you would prefer or just post here what you’d like. I don’t think I’m quite sure what your particular model is or how you imagined life came to exist in the way that it did. I would be curious to see how your model performs compared to like let’s say one of natural selection/common descent – that has had many actual predictions that have been confirmed. Mini times, what I see with critics of the theory of evolution is that they love to kind of hit and run. So they take a jab here take a jab there never present any model or anything of substance of their own but just simply say ha ha this doesn’t seem to explain everything the way you think it is. And of course it doesn’t! We don’t have everything figured out; what do you think the tens of thousands of researchers in these areas are actively doing. But to point those out and ignore the questions that we’ve already answered is what a lot of post by anti-evolutionary websites and posts seem to do.
A general tactic of yours seems to selectively quotes parts of various papers to try and demonstrate that particular aspects of this whole theory are not quite what people think they are. Now, part of this can be a healthy exercise where everyone gets to learn something new! But what is not good is to ignore the main conclusions and findings of many of these papers and only select the quotes they have that you agree with. This is a quote mine and a tactic I’d like to see you stop using. I appreciate that your quote mines are at least new ones that I haven’t seen - as some posters who have come here literally copy a list of quite mines they got from somewhere else on the Internet as I noted in one particular occasion.