I feel that an important point is missed in these type of discussions, and that is this:
If evolutionists claim that ToE is random based and associated thinking, and they turn to stochastic methods to support their case, they should accept conclusions, that such as such an event is impossibly likely - this is a result from stochastic computations and not ideological arguments.
If otoh evolutionists believe ToE is a special case, and they still maintain a random basis, they need to provide an ab initio mathematical treatment that explicitly clarifies the nature of random events and how they lead to the observations currently made.
My current reading of PoSc on these matters has indicated evolutionists are incapable of doing either.
Do not get aggressive at me - simply read some prominent PoSc works and make your comments based on these.