The Big Tent ... and Genealogical Adam!

[gbrooks9 (George Brooks)]

@Bill_II

@gbrooks9 You know better. Those millions of American Evangelicals reject evolution because it is evil. That is the starting point. To support this leads to the rejection of the vast swaths of science and also brings out “The Bible is always right” which would include Paul’s misunderstood comments about Adam. At one point American Evangelicals had no problem with long time and evolution.

@Bill_II, @Jpm, @Christy:

This is the thread where I have posted three Creationist endorsements (2 are Old Earthers) for Genealogical Adam:

Were we defending Evolution?, not Hermeneutics 'Per Se'?

@Christy (@jpm & @pevaquark) It is not my intention to over-sell, though I am sure my enthusiasm for the “theoretical benefits” of Genealogical Adam does incline me to be ahead of the curve. I hope I am only temporarily ahead of the curve. But I must confess that there is a possibility that @Swamidass’ efforts to find widespread acceptance for Genealogical Adam amongst Creationists may not go as far as any of us would like. But I do stand firm behind my sincere belief that Genealogical Adam …