Seven “Why” Questions About Origins

Seven “Why” Questions About Origins

I am framing this as direct questions.
This is not a claim, only points engage dialogue.

Anyone is welcome to answer any one of them in a complete, coherent way.

1. The Compression Problem

Standard cosmology often speaks of an early universe so small and dense that ordinary physics cannot describe it, sometimes casually described as “smaller than a proton.”

Yet:

  • A stellar black hole of ~10–20 solar masses has an event-horizon radius on the order of tens of kilometers.

  • The total mass, energy of the observable universe is vastly greater than that.

Question:
How can the entire mass, energy content of the observable universe be physically said to have existed in a volume dramatically smaller than the event horizon that general relativity would predict for the same total mass?

Further:
What tested theory of gravity or quantum gravity describes this state without violating known limits on density, entropy, and information storage?

2. Pre-Existing, Fully Defined Laws

From the first physical moment onward, the universe behaves according to fixed, precise rules:

  • specific interaction strengths

  • specific particle masses

  • specific symmetries

  • specific conservation laws

  • specific speed of light

These do not evolve over time; they are “there” from the start.

Question:
By what mechanism are these laws and constants selected and fixed before any physical process can exist to determine them?

Further:
Why are their values exactly those that allow stable atoms, long-lived stars, complex chemistry, and habitability, rather than any of the far more numerous value-sets that would allow none of these?

3. Photons Already Carry the Full Electromagnetic Structure

When radiation first streams freely, photons already exhibit:

  • quantized energy E=hνE=hν

  • the full electromagnetic spectrum of possible frequencies

  • polarization, wave–particle duality

  • well-defined interactions with charged particles

They are not primitive, half-formed objects; they have all the properties needed to:

  • transport energy

  • encode information

  • generate color and temperature

  • drive chemistry and radiation processes

Question:
Why does radiation begin its existence already possessing the full complexity described by quantum electrodynamics, rather than gradually “developing” into this structure?

Further:
What explanation is offered for the fact that the first freely moving thing in the universe is already a completely specified carrier of all future visible beauty (colors, spectra, radiance)?

4. Hydrogen, Helium, and the Element Ladder

From the early plasma, the universe settles into a composition dominated by hydrogen and helium.
Later, in stars, this leads to the full periodic table.

Question:
Why does the early universe cool into exactly the simple nuclei that:

  • ignite stellar fusion, and

  • naturally build up, step by step, to the elements required for organic chemistry (carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, etc.)?

Further:
Why do nuclear binding energies, reaction pathways, and stability patterns align so precisely that a usable periodic table emerges, instead of a sterile set of unstable or non-cooperative nuclei?

5. The Specific Cosmological “Recipe”

Observations indicate a particular mix:

  • ~5% ordinary (baryonic) matter

  • ~25–30% dark matter

  • ~65–70% dark energy

This narrow combination allows:

  • galaxy and cluster formation

  • long-term structure

  • neither rapid recollapse nor runaway dispersion too early

Question:
What mechanism fixes these cosmic proportions at values that permit a structured universe, rather than the far more generic outcomes of immediate collapse or featureless expansion?

Further:
Why does dark energy’s influence dominate only after structure has formed, instead of erasing it from the outset?

6. Low Entropy and High Order at the Start

For a generic, random initial condition, most possible universes:

  • do not form atoms,

  • do not form stars,

  • or remain near-maximum entropy with no large-scale order.

Yet our universe begins in a very special, extremely low-entropy state from which large-scale structure can evolve.

Question:
What explains the initial, highly ordered, low-entropy configuration required for galaxies, stars, and planets to appear at all?

Further:
Why is the universe not only ordered but also mathematically describable and stable across billions of years?

7. The Emergence of Intelligence from Non-Intelligence

Fundamental matter and fields, as described by physics, do not possess:

  • consciousness

  • self-awareness

  • symbolic reasoning

  • moral perception

  • intentionality

Yet human beings do.

Question:
How does a universe that begins with non-conscious matter and impersonal laws give rise to subjective inner experience and rational, self-reflective minds?

Further:
Why is the resulting universe so strikingly comprehensible to those minds; mathematically, logically, aesthetically, if intelligence is only a late, accidental byproduct?

In the very first moments, the universe was an extremely hot and dense state of pure energy, and all particles were massless, traveling at the speed of light.

They were not “selected and fixed”. Do you mean a physical process that could be used to determine them?

Are you trying to imply that physics “evolved”?

BTW, color is an artifact of your brain. You see colors but they are just slightly different frequences of electromatic radiation.

As the universe expanded and cooled hydrogen and helium were formed as protons and neutrons fused to form the first atomic nuclei. The cooling stopped further nuclear fusion.

God is faithful and sustains the universe.

God gave us the ability to see His handiwork in the universe. See Romans 1:20.

Is God capable of creating a point source universe, finely tuned with the necessary and sufficient laws, which without further intervention would give rise to mankind?

I’m not responding to hacked up quotes. Ask about one claim at a time, and I’ll answer. And no, there is no science behind gluons and quark being massless. In that density, the Higgs was mass all around… in theory. By the way, my post was asking rhetorical questions.

My post was asking rhetorical questions. I believe only God could create such an infinitely diverse universe.

Got it. So why did you ask for answers?

2 Likes

The questions were directed towards our friends across the isle!

Mr Remiel Wise, you are bright. You may enjoy interaction more by “steel manning.” Unfortunately, rhetorical questions with lack of genuine willingness to discuss the science can come across as “Gish Galloping.”

Thanks.

What is Steelmanning? - Steelman Anything

Gish gallop - Wikipedia