I’ve already presented the counter argument. It’s solid. You’re looking in the wrong place. I don’t need to keep repeating it, as you keep repeating your frustations.
Still clarifying here: What was the nature of the power he demonstrated over sin? In what way did God show his power over sin? In what way did God overcome it?
I’m looking for the basic nuts and bolts here.
(I agree. We don’t need to go down the “problem of evil” rabbit hole.)
That is a good question in light of my point about moral and honorable atheists and agnostics I know.
Why would they treat everyone right, if there seems to be nothing to judge them afterward. Judgement is not a motivator for them.
I think an evolutionary psychologist would see a reason for morality in societies, whether they were comprised of theists or not.
But is it true that it’s hardwired? How can you be sure? Hardwired for some atheists and agnostics but not Christians? If it’s really hardwired, how does it not work for some?
One of the agnostics I have in mind IS hardwired to challenge all unsubstantiated belief. He can’t help himself. Judgement and moralities are even unsubstantiated beliefs for him. Yet he lives a powerfully ethical life–without concern for judgement.
Was it hardwired before Jesus’s good deed?
Could you please demonstrate support for your statement that the devil has come into Christians?
Is that true for all Christians? How can one know?
Are all people who behave immorally at one time or another or all the time possessed by the devil?
And back to your original post: Why on earth would you want to claim a God who offers grace that you find so offensive, rather than the judgement and damnation you seem so interested in – even for yourself – and whose followers are all possessed by the devil?
What kind of God is that? And the mass of mess that claim him?
The Christian movement is a degeneracy movement composed of reject and refuse elements of every kind: it is not the expression of the decline of a race, it is from the first an agglomeration of forms of morbidity crowding together and seeking one another out— It is therefore not national, not racially conditioned; it appeals to the disinherited everywhere; it is founded on a rancor against everything well- constituted and dominant: it needs a symbol that represents a curse on the well-constituted and dominant— It also stands in opposition to every spiritual movement, to all philosophy: it takes the side of idiots and utters a curse on the spirit. Rancor against the gifted, learned, spiritually independent: it detects in them the well- constituted, the masterful.
Nietzsche, Friederich, The Will To Power, pg 78.