@DGX37 The questions revolve around our comprehension of the Divine, freedom, and human capabilities. Concerning God and the creation, natural philosophy has proposed views that: (1) God acted as He willed to gift the Universe and is actively engaged in the creation, and (2) God established immutable laws which are etched on all things, and He ensures these are maintained in the creation. Both views are interesting but debates on this site currently focus on the notion of laws of nature.
It is theologically accepted that God created everything from nothing, and all the creation is subject to, and is sustained by Him. Human beings are created with the capacity to reason and act, within the limitations we observe in our existence. The Creation provides humanity with (to us) is an inexhaustible range of possibilities and choices. We may summarise the choices we may make as either good for life, or bad with consequences that diminish us. When we choose life and what is good, we grow in the attributes (discussed in the bible), while if we choose evil, we are diminished and are considered to develop bad habits. This is what I understand as predetermined. God does not force us to choose, but He knows us and thus we would consider this as for-ordained.
There is extensive literature that deals with the various views on freedom. Freedom is often a term that encapsulates self-determination, autonomy, and unconstrained or spontaneity of a rational human being, including the absence of submissiveness and servility. The subject matter is all encompassing as the concept of freedom may be considered as an abstract and normative value of human action, or as a concrete experience of humans. It may be inferred that freedom within a completely determined world would be an act of will, so that a passive person is transformed into an active one through reason, and in this way attain to freedom. Although an act of will may be consistent with choice, the inference in this view is that freedom is considered within a completely determined world. Such a view is difficult to reconcile with choice, change, chance, and uncertainty found in the world (particularly that of human choice and the ability to interfere with other people’s activity, and to interfere with natural activity). Does this mean that freedom cannot be equated with a human capacity to choose?
Our reality is faced with chance, possibilities, and outcomes that are often such that we would wish to choose otherwise, after a conscious choice had been made. Additionally, even though we were to believe we had made a correct choice, the outcome may be contrary to what we initially understood should have been. The causality we believed was correct, may in fact prove otherwise for that act, resulting in an illusion of choosing correctly, but actualising as other-than the intended choice. Indeed, we are subject to the necessity of seeking the distinction between good and evil, which is accompanied with the bitterness of choice, highlighting the biblical teaching that we are slaves to sin, and all having sinned and come short of the glory of God.
As you would note, the subject matter is large and this post is sufficient for the time being.