Hello all, I came across this article in the NYT and recalled several conversations here from some time ago. I thought some might enjoy it. Merry Christmas to everyone
Impossible.
You think you can put God under a microscope?
Impossible!
For this reason, whatever âproofâ you think to find will never satisfy the standards required by science. God is not a part of mathematical space-time structure of the universe by which measurements and scientific methods are possible.
If I could read that article, that would do.
Not that thereâs any point.
If a miracle occurred it would need no proof. I wouldnât need to prove it. If you have to prove it, you canât and itâs not a miracle anyway.
This man knows nothing.
@Klax and others, if a paywall is blocking you then this âgiftâ link should be good for 30 days. (I think it is good in the UK â let me know if itâs not, not that I can do anything about it. Iâm just curious.)
But is there any evidence that would persuade a nonbeliever that God was behind it â that we do not live in a closed system in which all causation is a matter of natural laws?
No. Jesus said so explicitly in the parable of Dives (the rich man) and Lazarus:
âHe said to him, ââŚthey will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.ââ
Luke 16:21
Miracles can happen too without breaking any natural laws, only spectacular timing and placing â even Jesus calming the storm on the Sea of Galilee was one of those. A man in a boat said something (to the storm!) and it became âcompletely calmâ.1 What natural laws were broken? Cause and effect could not be âprovenâ.
Special providence is like that too, as evidence demonstrates, although some foolishly say that it is laughable that God is a loving Father who is sovereign over time and space, timing and placing. My nephrectomy does not demonstrate miraculous healing, but it most certainly does demonstrate Godâs providence (especially for my wife, since I donât want to leave her here without me, not that Iâm not ready or that God wouldnât take care of her, but it would be tough on her! ; - ).
1 (And they had to row⌠all the rest of the way, demonstrating that faith and trust can be easier than not. ; - )
Thanks Dale. Itâs worse than I thought. Dembski. I ask you. If my dead were raised, Iâd believe. How could I not. Jesusâ hyperbole in His allegory isnât true. Iâd know for certain that there was the supernatural. But then if the power that was raising the dead concurrently said something vile, Iâd know it was infinitely worse. And Iâve encountered many people in the worldâs sixth wealthiest nation that need a miracle as much as any Nigerian or Mozambican needs glasses or hearing aids, and never get them. Whatâs God trying to prove? And Iâve heard missionary stories from devout missionaries, three to me personally, and they were desperately sad. Because none of them could actually lie to me. Which is what it would have taken.
Jesusâ situation at the Last Supper was desperately sad too. (We could try and make a comparison of scale for tragic circumstances, an exercise of sorrow, but it wouldnât buy us anything.) The Son of God demonstrated what our mindset should be, not focusing on the evil, but giving thanks, eucharisteo in the moment, existentially. He knew there would be a better morning and new day. Not that I am excited about William James (more sorry for him), but a valuable idea adapted from him is that we make a continuous moral choice in what we pay attention to. It is a moral act every moment when we are awake (or an immoral one). George MĂźller would not leave his morning devotions until he was happy in God (you remember him, incarnational Geo.? ;Â -Â ).
BUTâŚ
If you think you can live solely according to what science can establish, then you are greatly mistaken. It is unavoidable that many if not most of our choices of belief are not according to proof by scientific standards but according to personal experiences. And according to those standards by which we believe many if not most things, there is plenty of proof. Plenty of reasons to believe. Even reasons that some atheists can understand and appreciate as being necessary for our very humanity.
This topic was automatically closed 6 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.