On the Apocalypses of the Bible (Again)

After reviewing the evidence I think it’s time to admit that the Book of Daniel predicts the end of the world during the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes and that Revelation predicts the end of the world very soon after it’s written during the late first century or early second century Roman Empire and that these things did not happen.

I don’t think that this is a problem for Christianity though because of what’s written in this book Amazon.com

Basically what the book argues is two things, 1. that prophecy is conditional based upon the reaction of the people prophecized to, and 2. That it is part of the Jewish context of the Bible to have the end predicted soon but then have it delayed and this kind of tension or conflict was inherent to the Jewish worldview.

Thus it should not be surprising when the end is predicted in the Bible, as it was three times and it is delayed further. As for what to do with these prophecies and why they are in the Bible, Paul deals with the unfulfilled prophecies of Daniel 11:35-45 by putting them in the future in 2 Thessalonians 2 with the man of lawlessness, so it’s safe to say that all unfulfilled prophecies await future fulfillment which would make the futurist reading of Revelation correct.

The first prophecy regarding “the end of the world” (as we know it) is contained in Genesis 1-2. The seven days of creation is a framework for understanding God’s 7000 year plan for man’s redemption. This prophecy is still valid and the day of the Lord is approaching.

As far as the prophecies in Daniel, it is possible you may be focused on the wrong ones. I believe the most important prophecies in the book of Daniel are the ones pointing to the nation of Israel being scattered for 2520 years and then being regathered…IN THE LAST DAYS.

2520 Prophetic Years X 360 days = 907,200 days or 2483 years, 285 days

2520 Prophetic years after the decree of Cyrus in 537BC, the nation of Israel was reestablished on May 14, 1948…THE TIME OF THE END.

also

2520 Prophetic years after the decree of Darius in 518BC, Israel regained control of Jerusalem on June 7, 1967.

The end was not predicted and delayed.
The end is still coming right on schedule.

I know this is a complex, controversial topic and it can be challenging to unlearn the bad theology we’ve learned along the way, but that’s why we are here.

umm…

you know that the destruction of Jerusalem occurred 20 years prior to the book of Revelation actually being written right???

How a man can say make futuristic prophecies talking about end times 20 years after the events…i think you need to have someone who understands biblical history, theology and timelines to better explain the events to you again.

To point you in the right direction…

  1. John wrote Revelation on the Isle of Patmos under the reign of Ceasar Domitian

  1. I could also go into great detail about why the books of Daniel and Revelation should be studied together…but unless you understand type/antitype prophecies in the bible, it would be a very long and disjointed discussion on these forums (due to distractions from idiot replies from individuals who also do not understand it)…
  2. Truly understanding them requires formalised bible studies that take many hours to fully understand (quite often seminars on the books of Daniel and Revelation are done weekly over a period of months…so these forums are probably not the place for that). I would suggest that there are plenty of resources on the topic…from all angles, however, i can categorically state, the Antiochus Epiphanese claims are highly problematic (if not to begin with one should remind you that the only time Antiochus attempted to invade Israel, he got sent packing with his tail between his legs shortly thereafter. He never actually succeeded in extending the Selucid empire during his reign, that had already been achieved before he took the throne. During his reign the kingdom began to decline.

I didn’t even mention the Temple of Jeruselum so I have no idea what you’re on about.

The rather divergent interpretations that Clovis and RevelationVBS provide both come from assuming that the passages tell us the time of the end in a calendar sense. Yet Jesus specifically said that no one knows the time. Daniel foresees another secular kingdom beyond the Greek as well as time involved in establishing the heavenly kingdom beyond that. The wild variation in conclusions about the dates suggests that the Bible is not telling us when, but rather that we should always be alert to living wisely and being prepared for our own end.

4 Likes

From the 70 weeks prophecy it was possible to calculate when the Messiah would come the first time. In Luke 19:42 as Jesus is approached Jerusalem, he wept over it because the vast majority had not paid attention to prophecy and as a result they did not recognize the day of their salvation.

But that was not the case for all Israel. There was a faithful remnant of Jews out in the wilderness, who took prophecy seriously, had done the calculations and expected the Messiah to come in 32AD. They even left a scroll in cave 11 at Qumran that shows they understood that the Melchiezadek(Teacher of Righteousness) would come and die for the sins of the people.

So when Jesus says “No man knows the day and the hour” what is He talking about?

Is He saying that we can know absolutely nothing about end times events?

Or is He talking about something specific?

In the OT Israel is portrayed as the unfaithful wife of YHWH.
Isa 54:5-6; Jer 2:2, 3:14; Eze 16:8; Hos 1:2, 2:19-20

In the NT the church is portrayed as the faithful bride of Christ watching for her groom’s return.
2 Cor 11:2; John 3:29; Matt 9:15; Rev 21:2, 22:17

We are betrothed to Christ but we are waiting for the Father to tell the Son to go get His bride for the marriage supper of the Lamb.

In Matthew’s gospel Jesus talks about “not knowing the day and hour” twice; once in chapter 24 and again in chapter 25.

In chapter 24, the context of “not knowing the day and hour” is “Now learn the parable of the fig tree”. The context is “you can’t know the day and the hour, but the fig tree(Israel, 1948) is the sign that the season(of His coming for the bride) is coming”.

In chapter 25, the context of “not knowing the day and hour” is the parable of the foolish and wise virgins(10 brides maids, not the bride).
In Matthew 25:13 Jesus says:
Watch therefore, [look for the signs of the season]
for ye know neither the day nor the hour
wherein the Son of man [bridegroom]
cometh.‘ [for bride]

Again, the context was a parable about weddings.
‘In my Father’s house are many mansions: [rooms]
if it were not so, I would have told you.
I go to prepare a place for you. [bridechamber]
And if I go and prepare a place for you,
I will come again, and receive you unto myself; [the rapture]
that where I am, there ye may be also. ‘ [Father’s house]

When Jesus says “No man knows the day and the hour” what is He talking about?
He is talking about the rapture of the church(the bridegroom coming for the bride).
He is not talking about the tribulation, the Messiah’s second coming or the millennium.

This lines up nicely with what the angel said in Daniel 12:4
“But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book [2520 prophecies]
**UNTIL the time of the end. ** [1948]
many shall run to and fro, [Israel would be scattered and regathered]
and knowledge shall increase.” [The Dead Sea Scrolls are the key that unlocks]

Sounds like you are getting some interesting responses to your post, Clovis. I just started a class on Revelation–taught by a professor at a local evangelical college. This means that i am just learning. But we did get a lecture that when God says ‘soon’ --as in the first 3 verses of Revelation 1 — it may refer to the divine versus the human way of looking at things. What’s soon if you have lived forever? The book is a ‘revelation’ (hence the name) of things that have "already’ been set in motion by the crucifixion and resurrection, and also points inevitably to judgment…That last word should not be anyone’s favorite thought —but it’s coming somewhere along the way…

  1. Daniel is a great book that covers a range of situations. I have never heard of the idea that “prophecy” --at least the sort of “end times prophecy” you are pointing to – is at all conditional upon “the reaction of the people prophesied to.” Prophecy is a statement of what will eventually occur—the overcoming of evil and remaking of things entirely.

In the end, there are various visions and prophetic events (presumably prophetic) in Daniel…and then there are human beings trying to apply them to their own times and circumstances–and political perspectives. The truth may be that our timeframe is limited to 80 + years while God may be thinking entirely differently

…Some have in fact said that Antiochus IV Epiphanes was the Antichrist…but there are reasons for saying he was “not” the one to whom the prophetic utterances of Daniel referred…For example, his death is not “gotten right” if Ant Epi IV is the one meant in the prophecy. And the third invasion of Egypt was not something that Ant Epi IV did… Not long ago, a writer declared that the prophecies about Antichrist actually were fulfilled by Caligula. You will have to read on that yourself.

You actually could say that a lot of dictators and tyrants along the way could have (and likely did) look like Antichrist --Adolf Hitler anyone? Stalin? Genghis Khan? It certainly depends on whether it was YOUR time period of history --and how those individuals impacted you and your family…Others say there is an interval between now and the real AC…others have said the Antichrist was Nero, Simon Magus (see Acts 8)…Muhammad…the Pope…and the Pope thought Martin Luther was the Antichrist…Isaac Newton wrote commentary with his interpretation of some of this — based on the political concerns of his era…that is, “the Empire of the Saracens” versus “the Empire of the Turks”…John Bunyan thought the Antichrist would be a woman…

Thus “the man of lawlessness” has characteristics that could fit any number of past and present individuals…the fact that one has not arisen wearing some sort of special hat (or mark on his/her forehead)…does not mean prophecies have failed.

I don’t think that we can say the Bible has predicted the end “three times” and then it was delayed. But we humans are certainly willing to speculate.

1 Like

There seems to be recurrent patterns in the way how the biblical scriptures and the ‘real’ history are connected. For example, Isaiah 7:14 tells that a maiden will give birth to a child who gets the name Immanuel. It was a prophecy that probably looked at the near future but, according to Christian interpretation, it also told about the coming Messiah, Yeshua (Jesus).
These recurring patterns are like layers upon each other. Each layer is unique history but at the same time, may show a pattern that is part of a larger story, the great plan of God.

Maybe the apocalypses in the Bible include similar type of recurring layers. For example, there have been many antichrists during the history as even John the Apostle wrote (1 John 2:18).
Another example is that the current political developments in the Middle East and Eurasia might lead to a loose coalition that resembles some descriptions of the forces attacking Israel in the Revelation. At the moment, the development is just a potential scenario (might happen) but anyhow interesting. Possibly not the ‘original’ event described in the Revelation but a layer of history that might follow a described pattern.

Focusing too heavily on the events described in the Revelation is probably not wise but if we approach the apocalypses and forward-looking prophecies as descriptions of potentially recurring patterns, that may give better insights to what has happened and may happen in the future.

2 Likes