While browsing the IC wiki to know what sorts of things atheists can come up with, I found out that they use Occam’s Razor to argue not only against God, but against EC too!
"Occam’s Razor does apply in cases where God is needlessly invoked, such as with theistic evolution."
“While claiming compatibility with science, theistic evolution is not required for the evolutionary process to occur and does not provide any additional explanatory power. Therefore the theistic evolution hypothesis can be discarded by Occam’s razor.”
"Evolution is full of failed attempts, suffering of living things and the extinction of most historic species. An omnipotent designer would not use such cruel means to create humans."
I had never thought about this, but, fortunately, there are cases in which anti-razors are needed. I’ll leave you with some: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam’s_razor#Anti-razors
What do you think about Occam’s Razor being used to argue against EC? Is it really valid?