The peace of the Lord! I am the Gaius, I am of the Baptist Church Bethel, i am from Brazil, and i met the BioLogos through the book "The Language of God" of Francis Collins who was translated to Brazilian Portuguese, I am in a moment of my life of much criticism for everything, and Genesis 1 was one of the targets. I have some doubts about the veracity of the theory of evolution, wanted gave me confidence with evidence as to this and a definitive answer, if possible with evidence, the following questions:
What would be the fall of man if Genesis 1 is not literally?
On the age of the earth... if it were so old, the index of nickel and Iridio was abundant in the earth, because there would be spent several meteor showers, today we can see how many meteors fall per unit of time and how many per cent of these heavenly bodies have Nickel and Iridio, doing the calculations, if the earth were of 4.5 billion years, would have an abundance of these metals, and these metals are rare...
We know that the strength of the magnetic field of the earth is divided by half every 1400 years.. Going back in time... in 10,000 BC the land would have to be a star imaging, by the great strength that she had in its magnetic field, as could sustain life? We see the solution of inversion, every 140 thousand years (if I am not mistaken), for this reason, but for the polo be reversed, the earth would have to stop, since it is a dipole, and stopping abruptly, the oceans will invade the earth in such a way that record would be geological present today! But it doesn't have! And if it was reduced slowly to its rotation, at least 10 % of the speed, one side would be frozen the other would be burned, as this can support a process of evolution of life?
Also on the geologic timescale of the earth.. we know that the sun shrinks 1 meter and 52 centimeters per hour, if we go back in time, in 100,000,000 bc the diameter of the sun would be so great that engoliria the planets... how can sustain life in evolution? Taking into consideration that life arose in, more or less, 3.5 billion years?
Cosmic dust fall many tonne on the moon per unit of time (which i don't remember now), in 1969 NASA found that, given the age of the moon, there would be 300 meters of dust on the moon, so much so that Neil Armstrong forehead with his feet before leaving the ladder, but there were only 10 centimeters of dust... we can see this in the video of the arrival on the moon...
There is no transitional fossils officially found...
Method potassium-argon dated volcanic rocks, in millions of years, which had been formed 200 years in an eruption known;
As an evolution can transform life, unicellular in pre-Cambrian in life pluricelular, in Cambrian period?
There was an error in the experience of Miller... the experience of simulating the primordial atmosphere generated 85% of tar, which is toxic to life, 13% of monocarboxylic acids, which also is toxic to life, and only 2% of amino acids, which were only amino acids are left-handed, i.e. could not have cell multiplication with the racemic mixture, and none of these amino acids were bases of DNA( Arginine, lysine and histidine).
Please! Help me with this question! Thank you for your attention! God bless you!