Thanks Lynn for asking me to clarify, thanks also to Phil and beaglelady:
Your comments show the importance of defining better the concepts I use and are very helpful to me.
If you accept Evolution, Creation of humans by God as spiritual beings, and do not endorse Intelligent Design, you can’t help acknowledging that God created the primeval human persons (“Adam and Eve”) from Homo sapiens animals, which were not morally responsible and could not be guilty of sin.
When I say that the human creatures living far away from Noah were non-personal human animals, I mean that they were like the human creatures from which God created “Adam and Eve”.
Question:
Would it be better to say that these creatures living far away from Noah (outside Mesopotamia) “were human beings without sense of law and moral responsibility, and hence incapable of sinning”?
In any case the human persons living around Noah were aware of God’s law and therefore were obliged in principle to acknowledge the fundamental personal rights (in particular the right to life) to all creatures which did exhibit a human body, and consequently to all Homo sapiens individuals living outside Mesopotamia.
And at the end of the Flood God transformed the Homo sapiens individuals living all over the earth into persons with sense of law and capability to sin, that is, He created directly new human persons the same way as He created “Adam and Eve”. Nonetheless contrarily to “Adam and Eve” before the Fall, these new human persons created after the Flood were from the very beginning of their existence in need of Redemption, the same way as the descendants from Adam and Eve were (and are) in such a need.
In summary, confusing humans with animals is absolutely misleading and against my theory.
What is more, I claim that Evolution lays the groundwork for avoiding such confusion. Therefore when Darwin described Fuegians with racist terms showed that he was not fully aware of what Evolution is all about.
I will be most thankful to you for answering my question above and for any further suggestion about possible better formulations that may help to avoid misunderstandings.