That has nothing to do with what I wrote: I was in fact accused of lying when I related how in geology lab we dated a number of rocks using established laboratory methods.
False – and you know it.
It wasn’t – it was written for the original audiences in their language, using their literary types, with their worldview. To say otherwise insults both the ancient audience – who are part of God’s people – as well as the Holy Spirit Whose intent it was to communicate clearly to those people.
Only to someone who thinks that if there’s one pink flower in a bouquet then all the flowers must be pink, or that because one clock is correct then all clocks must be correct.
That’s actually a myth invented to support the false view of Genesis 1 that pretends it is modern literature.
Because we aren’t stupid enough to think that the entire Torah was written as the same type of literature – because we should be humble enough to let the text be what it is, what it was written to be, instead of insisting that we are so superior that we don’t need to actually study in order to understand.