Quote from @colewd from another Blog:
ID is science based on the standards of science. All you are left with is subjective non scientific arguments that violate proper philosophical standards.
@colewd
This quote from you (shown above, and made in another blog) has to be your most egregiously erroneous statement there to date!:
This is a better description:
I.D. is better understood as “an Epistemological Assertion that the sciences can document and demonstrate God’s existence by demonstrating the presence of God’s design in creation.”
In other words, ID is a sub-topic of the vastly more general topic: Proving the Existence of God.
Any philosopher or scientists can see that I.D. is not self-evidently true - - since if it were, the question of whether or not we could Prove God’s Existence would be considered TRUE and CONFIRMED!