The folks at “Reasons to Believe” are proposing a new term to explain the universe - hypernaturalism.
They claim that it is a better explanation than “naturalism” and “supernaturalism”. It sounds remarkably similar to TE/EC which is as unprovable as the multiverse. Anything new here? Anything insightful?
Links please? Haven’t heard that term before.
It sounds to me that Reasons to Believe are trying to cash in on the QP craze. QP uncertainty can “prove” anything you want it to.
TE/EC is trying to explain Creation within the framework of science, rather than speculation.
This topic was automatically closed 3 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.