(Patrick ) #1

The folks at “Reasons to Believe” are proposing a new term to explain the universe - hypernaturalism.
They claim that it is a better explanation than “naturalism” and “supernaturalism”. It sounds remarkably similar to TE/EC which is as unprovable as the multiverse. Anything new here? Anything insightful?

(Brad Kramer) #2

Links please? Haven’t heard that term before.

(Patrick ) #3


(Roger A. Sawtelle) #4


It sounds to me that Reasons to Believe are trying to cash in on the QP craze. QP uncertainty can “prove” anything you want it to.

TE/EC is trying to explain Creation within the framework of science, rather than speculation.

(system) #5

This topic was automatically closed 3 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.