How much science should we expect other people to understand?

Quite the opposite. You have spent most of this thread telling us to ignore science and facts.

The problem is that your argument is to ignore facts, calling them not worth believing in or relative. For example,

“All is relative including all your so called facts.”

“If you can not accept that most things are relative if not subjective, your debate will be rigid, dogmatic and serve no purpose outside yourself.”

“Facts today turn into lies tomorrow, like the centre of the universe … is that a fact too?”

“There are thousands if not millions of false “facts” that humans have adopted as true for milenia.
By ignorance, by omission, bias, protecting agenda or interests, you name it, that is man’s history.”

You have been impervious to facts.

4 Likes