So I wrote an blogpost where I set out my case for a solid Raqia, in response to an article by JP Holding (who I used to like until now) for AiG. I sent the blogpost to Holding, and in return he publicly mocked me on Theology web:
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/showthread.php?10140-Ultimate-Screwballs-Thread/page343
So I understand that I did something wrong here. Can anyone provide some constructive criticism of my post here:
https://riderontheclouds.wordpress.com/2018/06/28/yes-jp-holding-the-raqia-was-a-solid-dome/
What is wrong with it?
This matters because if the Hebrews did not think the sky is solid, then Genesis ‘is’ a work of science, and the TE/EC view of Genesi (as well as evolution as a whole) is jeopardised.