Help with an issue I'm having (on the Raqia)

So I wrote an blogpost where I set out my case for a solid Raqia, in response to an article by JP Holding (who I used to like until now) for AiG. I sent the blogpost to Holding, and in return he publicly mocked me on Theology web:
So I understand that I did something wrong here. Can anyone provide some constructive criticism of my post here:
What is wrong with it?

This matters because if the Hebrews did not think the sky is solid, then Genesis β€˜is’ a work of science, and the TE/EC view of Genesi (as well as evolution as a whole) is jeopardised.

1 Like

10 posts were merged into an existing topic: Is the Raqia solid or not?