Who’s version: yours or Christianity’s; yours or Judaism’s; yours or Islam’s; your’s or the Qur’an’s; yours or the Old Testament’s? your’s or this forum’s official position which assumes Christianity’s and the Old Testament"?
Does this forum’s “official policy of 'gracious dialogue” encourage you to believe that your “theory of an ‘Exodus from the Indus Valley’” should prevail–in this forum–over Christianity and the Tanakh’s claim that the Exodus was from Egypt by Jews led by Moses"?
Before you answer that, read this statement from BioLogos’ FAQS/Guidelines:
“Participate with an aim to gain deeper understanding about orthodox Christian faith and/or mainstream science, and constructively explore the relationship between them. Users whose participation in discussions seems primarily focused on promoting unorthodox religious beliefs, idiosyncratic ideas about faith and/or science, or anti-religious sentiments will be asked to take their proselytizing efforts elsewhere.”
What say you? That you have a right under “under the rule of gracious dialogue” to present your case for your theory of “an Exodus from the Indus Valley” based on “possibilities”?
You’ve asserted your claim, much to my dismay, chagrin, and objection.
All your protests aside, your claim is an attack on the faith of Christians–in this forum and outside of this forum.
Neither God the Father nor Jesus Christ need my defense. But I cannot and will not stand by silently while you question and challenge the faith of people who loved me more than I deserved and while you continue to attempt to replace fundamentals of that faith with your theory based on “possibilities”.
Jesus would have followed the belief prevalent after LXX. His focus was on breaking the shackles and establishing love.
Please respond to the points in the op.
Please not buy it. Contest it. This is a place for gracious dialogue not war.
I have read Terry’s bio and am touched. May there be more christians who help the young.
Oh, so you’re a “User” in this forum “whose participation in discussions seems primarily focused on promoting unorthodox religious beliefs”? By your own words you condemn yourself.
Don’t believe most of what you read in that thread.
Yes Moses would have known about time. The Egyptians invented sundials to tell time in the daytime and water clocks to tell time at night. Victor said
Yes, because the Egyptians had divided the day into 12 periods and the nights into 12 periods and everyone knows the length of the night changes during the year so they adjusted their water clocks to always indicate 12 periods during the night.
I told myself not to get started down this rabbit hole, but here I go.
Wrong, as you have been told multiple times. The early pyramids were built with mud brick cores. Temple storehouses were built with mud brick. The workers on the stone pyramids were housed and fed in mud brick buildings.
Wrong. The collection of straw would have been additional effort that had to be expended while the tally of bricks remained the same.
A simple assertion on your part with no evidence to back it up. And God could part the Red Sea just like in the movie if He so choses.
No, Moses was dark, you said so yourself, just like all of the people around him. So by your logic all of the people around Moses also have a connection to Krishna.
So one name is A R N and the other is A R M, or a 66% match. Now how many other pairs of names can you find with only a 66% match?
Given all of your “points” suffer from confirmation bias I see no reason to continue to point out the problems with your theory.
I will close with this tidbit from The Rise of Ancient Israel.