What is the best starting point for an evolutionary creationist in a conversation with a very committed antievolutionist (opposed specifically to macroevolution) who believes that teachings about Adam being uniquely created in God’s image apart from animals cannot be reconciled with evolutionary theory which connects all life in a family tree?
1 Like
I would ask what evidence it would take to convince them evolution is correct. And when they answered “nothing”, I would just say “Have a blessed day.” and walk away. Until a anti-evolutionist wants to change they won’t.
5 Likes
I agree with @Bill_II. When people are looking to argue not seek truth, there isn’t a point in trying to convince them to change their mind. Their goal is to win not learn. You don’t have enough common ground to have a productive conversation, so spend your time elsewhere.
3 Likes
Staying away might be the best option if it is someone you do not need to engage with.
If you must, draw a distinction between the religious belief and what we learn from science. The only conflict is one imposed by the belief itself, as demonstrated by the many (most!) who do not have this conflict. This is not a scientific question, and it is usually better not to bring science into the discussion at all.
If necessary add: The science of evolution works, greatly furthering our knowledge and understanding. It gives us patents, inventions, new medical treatments, and opens new areas of research and discovery, and all of these are the hallmarks of good science.
The few times I’ve been in that position I’ve asked, “What does that have to do with Jesus?” Then I just stubbornly insisted that if they weren’t going to talk about Jesus, I had better things to do.
I’m not claiming it was usually effective, but I got a couple of people anyway to shift their perspective.