Evidence for evolutionary creationism

[jammycakes (James McKay)]

@Burrawang

this is in reference to the effect of magma coming into contact with the seabed and ocean water resulting in higher evaporation rates, that as I described in my post is the only mechanism that makes sense regarding a cause for the one ice age directly after the flood, which may have lasted for several hundred years until the oceans eventually cooled down.

What on earth are you talking about?? The 22,400°C was their own admission about what accelerated nuclear decay would do.

@Burrawang

I have met Andrew Snelling and corresponded with John Baumgardner and can testify that they are honest dedicated scientists who are seeking to understand the mechanisms God employed in His creation.

I think you may want to take a look at this:

Misrepresentation of Grand Canyon rock formations

The YEC claim about the “bent” rocks in the Grand Canyon not being fractured is brazenly dishonest. Here is the AIG photo: [image] And here is a photo of the same rock formation taken by the US Geological Survey: [image] (Original photo is here: https://3dparks.wr.usgs.gov/grca/river/html2/grca2007.htm) If you look at the corner of the fold on the USGS photo, you will see a couple of quite obvious fractures. These are obscured in the AIG photo not only by the fact that it’s out of focus, b…

@Burrawang

The heat produced from accelerated nuclear decay is certainly a problem yet to be solved.

Oh come on. The heat problem for accelerated nuclear decay is a deal breaker. It doesn’t take a “secularist” or a “materialist” worldview to see this, and it’s not a case of different worldviews giving different interpretations. Accelerated nuclear decay is a claim that is so bad that I’ve even had young earthists tell me they thought it was some sort of parody to “discredit creationism.”