You know you people.dont read widely enough on the problems here…
Take the following complaint about Lisle’s ideas from another scientific forum…
His “model” is that the Bible is using an anisotropic synchrony convention and creation on the “4th day” is given within an anisotropic nomenclature.
There is a very good reason to choose an isotropic convention, although one which would likely escape Lisle. If you’ll recall…our whole universe was in a hot, dense state, then nearly 14 billion years ago, expansion started. We know from the CMB that there was contact between all parts of the observable universe during the pre-inflationary epoch. This means that we started at a point in which all parts of the universe had essentially the same location, making an anisotropic convention impossible. We define comoving time relative to the Big Bang because that is how we started.The failure of Jason Lisle's ASC paradigm - #51 by David_MacMillan - Peaceful Science
Note the reason why Lisle must be wrong according to that writers statement…
Its because the universe must have derived from a “hot dense state”!
That is not what the bible states or even implies. The Bible quite clearly states/implies that all knowledge and matter comes directly from God…what this means is that for the Christian, in order for the gospel to be true, He (God) is not bound to science. If He was, the Second Coming is impossible because its unscientific.
“God spoke and it was so”…that is no different from the miracle of rasing Lazurus from the dead, Christ rising from the dead, or Christ ascending into heaven against gravity and in a vacuum unsurvivable by us in bodily form (resurrected Christ was physical read “doubting thomas” in the gospels)….none of those miracles are scientifically probable or even possible.
Attempting to jgnore that very obvious dilemma in Darwinian views inserted into Christianity, thus corrupting it, refutes all thjs bullshit about the distant starlight problem in a 6 day Creation…its simply not relevant and the miracles of Christ prove that for the Christian. You people are dog barking up trees…its plain stupid. The Christians here should find something intelligent to talk about because its pointless arguing with or from the persepective of atheists about this issue.
Two world views who have an opposing consensus on God cannot find common ground on miracles and science when it comes to this and many other supposed problems the atheist raises. The answer is God…the atheist doesnt accept God.
That reaches the end of any meaningful discussion between the two…they fundamentally cannot agree beyond this point unless one is willng to cave in their world view.