Different kinds of gaps

[adamjedgar (adam james edgar)]

@pevaquark

It seems like your main argument is that in this one case, explanatory gaps appear to have gotten larger with more scientific inquiry - therefore it makes sense to consider alternative explanations for gaps in the explanation of natural phenomena. Would you say that in certain cases, it makes more sense to be open to supernatural explanations but in other cases, it makes less sense to be open to supernatural explanations? After all, the general rule seems to work the other way around, where explanatory gaps are closed or narrowed by scientific mechanisms - like with the evolution of bacterial flagellum for example or with the stability of the solar system.

how can you quote the biologos article on bacterial flagellum when Michael Behee (as one of an ever increasing number of creation scientists) exposed this problem in the evolutionary theory and have shown that its a very problematic example for evolutionists?