Let me explain.
I found the OP offensive and out of place in a (at least in appearance) Christian forum.
So … I set of challenging the “facts” most rely on for their high horse points of view, point being that many so called facts turn out to be pure fiction.
Second I introduce a topic dear to me, that I was sufficiently confident none of you had a clue about.
The way this evolved was perfectly predictable.
Non mainstream topics when presented, provide the perfect opportunity for observers, to use rebuttals using safe and mainstream reasoning, even when ignoring the matter completely.
The classic fringe, unorthodox case was heliocentrism.
Here we have the diet-heart hypothesis, challenged by a few well versed yet non mainstream professionals.The reaction from the participants of this thread is again predictable.
Ad hominem comments, mainstream defence, or both.
How much science do I have to expect from those who reply to my posts?
Well … I have no right to “expect” much at all.
There is always a level of hope that some may be interested in something they know nothing about and venture some leftfield reasoning.
An unkind participant would have quoted Dunning-Kruger effect, but I am not unkind, only curious.
