Common Descent Cladograms are all Fake, Convergent Evolution Explains Everything

[T_aquaticus]

@Ashwin_s

Actually, we have court judgements that say, any theory that posits a creator is not science by definition.

That’s because a creator can’t be tested for, as shown by the failure of ID proponents to do so.

@Ashwin_s

As you said, even though they don’t mention a creator directly, and stick tot he idea of a designer, it was concluded that it was not science as the idea was too close to creationism.

It was too close to creationism because it wasn’t science. It lacked testable hypotheses.

@Ashwin_s

So yes, Science suppresses all hypothesis connected to a creator/the possibility of the supernatural within its field of influence by its very nature.

You would first have to show us an ID based hypothesis for this to be true.