-
You didn’t provide any “empirical evidence”.
-
The “peer-reviewed article” was one you co-authored. It was published in a journal with an absolutely insignificant impact factor of 0.64. The publisher of the journal is known for lack of academic rigor and unethical practices. If your paper had any credibility you would have no difficulty getting it published in a high impact journal by a reputable publisher.
-
The “letter of the Class for Chemistry of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences” says absolutely nothing to support your claims. It specifically contradicts you, by saying that genetic mutations occur, and they are essential for evolution to take place.
-
You have demonstrated once again that you have not followed the scientific method; you have been unable to provide any evidence of hypotheses, experiments, and evidence based conclusions.
This proves you do not understand mutations and their effects. Do you agree that “mutagenic chemicals and radiation can also have a healing effect”? Because that’s a statement made in the “letter of the Class for Chemistry of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences” which you appealed to.
Your pseudo-scientific gibberish won’t get any support here. People are too well informed about science. You’re better off taking it somewhere like AiG.