Are these the false prophets God warned us about?

Dear Ron,
thank you for your thoughts, I have read them, but do not see any reason why the claims you are making, in any way are faithful and true.
Yet, the Holy Bible is faithful and True and He that sits on the throne in Heaven is faithful and True.
You claim by inference that the Earth has orbited the sun billions of times, that therefore it is billions of years old, in contradiction of common sense and the Holy Scriptures.
Do you believe that the Holy Bible is the infallible Word of God?
Do you believe that Adam and Eve were real people that were created directly by God?
Do you believe that ‘evolution’ is how life came to be as it is on Earth?

Yes, of course the majority of the world has overwhelmingly agreed that ‘deep time’ is real and evolution is real, but that is hardly surprising, given that the world hates the Truth. Most of the mass media and most of academia perpetuate these two myths.

The reality is that ‘deep time’ is a tragic myth that has blinded millions of people and caused good people to fall away from the faith in droves, as churches compromise to the teachings of the inevitable, ‘wolves in sheep’s clothing’ that abound in places such as this Biologos website.

All over the planet there are enormous fossil graveyards where many different types of animal remains have been washed away from disparate ecosystems and buried together in mass fossil graveyards, where terrestrial plants and animals and marine creatures have been rapidly buried together, I say ‘rapidly’ only because of the exquisite preservation of detail in the fossil remains.
If the burial wasn’t rapid, then decay, from bacterial and fungal action and oxidation and of course scavenging would have utterly destroyed the remains leaving nothing, but the reality is that even jellyfish and skin textures are beautifully preserved in the fossils, thus a very rapid sediment laden watery burial is a rational explanation as to why billions of fossils are so sharply defined in the field, and this is no surprise for a Christian who accepts the Holy Bible as the inerrant Word of God, teaching us Truth about the catastrophic Global flood in Noah’s day.

The remnants of soft tissue and actual bones of dinosaurs that have been discovered sticking out of the surface of the ground in locations where the mean temperatures often exceed 25 degrees C, and not been mineralised, and contain osteocytes, blood vessel structures and proteins including DNA fragments of a few linked base pairs, demonstrate very clearly the blatant lie of ‘deep time’. More and more dinosaur soft tissue is being added to the literature every year.

What we find all over the Earth are billions upon billions of exquisitely preserved fossils, which is exactly what we would expect to find if the whole planet was submerged under water as faithfully and accurately described in the Holy Bible.

REAL examples that demonstrate this reality are not hard to find.
For example:

In a location within Mongolia’s Gobi Desert, Horner and his coworkers found 67 dinosaur skeletons in just one week!

Researchers will be digging up dinosaur fossils for years in a rich, newly discovered dinosaur graveyard in Wyoming, USA.‘The place is just crawling with bones’, said Smithsonian palaeontologist Michael Brett-Surman, who led a dig at the site.
The newly found fossil field may prove to have more dinosaur bones than Utah’s famous Dinosaur National Monument, or any other fossil prospecting area in North America. Billings Gazette (Montana), August 2, 1994 (p. 1).
Fossil dinosaur graveyards are clear evidence that some catastrophe, such as Noah’s Flood, overwhelmed the area. Bones don’t just sit around waiting to fossilize—they rot, unless buried quickly.

Researchers studying the fossil remains of duckbill dinosaurs have found a vast array of dinosaur ‘soft tissue’ within the bones. This latest find includes bone cells, blood vessels and fibrous collagen-like structures. They also made the first-ever discovery of osteocytes and blood vessels from a dinosaur backbone and its bony (ossified) tendons.
Scientists examined 17 unfossilized (i.e. not permineralized) dinosaur bones of various types from a mass mortality bonebed (‘graveyard’). Every bone sample contained osteocytes, described as ‘abundant’ in 10 of them, and another five as ‘frequent’. 16 of these 17 samples contained blood vessels, some of which were described as hollow and even “slightly pliable upon manipulation”. In addition, 14 of the bones were found to contain a fibrous collagenous matrix. Contrary to the old idea that it is impossible to find dinosaur soft tissue, the researchers wrote that “recent investigations have found such remarkable preservation to be quite common”.

Dinosaur fossil ‘graveyards’ have been found at many places around the world. One such ‘mass fossil graveyard’ in Patagonia, South America, has yielded a great many dinosaur fossils. Some of the fossils are of quite large creatures indeed, such as the T. rex-like Giganotosaurus (Greek gigas [giant] and notos [south]), measuring up to 14 m (47 ft) long. Many small dinosaurs are found there, too. But whether big or small, the excellent preservation of these fossils is consistent with the animals having perished and been covered over during the Flood of Noah’s day.

Michael J Oard reliably informs us that Dinosaurs are often found in large bone-beds or dinosaur graveyards, where many dinosaur bones are packed together. This provides evidence for at least catastrophic local floods. A few of these bone-beds contain thousands of dinosaurs and indicate catastrophic action. Probably the largest bone-bed in the world is located in north-central Montana, USA. Based on outcrops, an extrapolated estimate was made for 10,000 duckbill dinosaurs entombed in a thin layer measuring 2 km east-west and 0.5 km north-south. The bones are disarticulated and disassociated, and are orientated east-west. However, a few bones were standing upright, indicating some type of debris flow. Moreover, there are no young juveniles or babies in this bone-bed, and the bones are all from one species of dinosaur. Horner and Gorman describe the bone-bed as follows: “How could any mud slide, no matter how catastrophic, have the force to take a two- or three-ton animal that had just died and smash it around so much that its femur—still embedded in the flesh of its thigh—split lengthwise?” A cataclysmic event obviously is implied.

Another bone-bed containing thousands of duckbill dinosaurs, mostly in a single layer, is found in north-eastern Wyoming.
If you want to read about any more evidence of mass fossil graveyards of dinosaur and other animal fossils from disparate environmental niches, I recommend you read the article at:

Oard, M., The extinction of the dinosaurs, J. Creation 11(2):137–154, 1997; creation.com/the-extinction-of-the-dinosaurs.

The evidence is both massive and very clear for anyone with a Biblical worldview to see.
I am honestly quite amazed that for those souls that have imbibed the ‘deep time’ - ‘evolution’ worldview and allowed it to be thoroughly instilled in their brains as fact, the profoundly obvious REALITY remains invisible.

The distant starlight/time question remains unsolved though there are several theories in progress that resolve this, though none are proven at this point in time. The one that I very much think has promise is that from the results of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey or SDSS that’s *a major multi-spectral imaging and spectroscopic redshift survey of one third of the visible night sky, it appears that our galaxy may well be near the centre of a series of ‘onion shells’ as it were of galaxy concentrations. If we weren’t near the centre of this mapped structure, we would not be able to see these shells centred on our location at the apex of the survey map.


If it turns out that our location is somewhere in the general vicinity of the centre of mass of the universe, then it is quite rational that we would therefore be in an intense gravity well relative to locations far out at the extreme furthest location we can see. Now consistent with Einsteinian Relativity, it is well known through both theory and empirical measurement that time travels at different rates according to the gravity at the location of the observer. For example if this reality was not factored into the GPS system, the gravity at the satellite and the gravity at our location would not measure our coordinates accurately on our GPS devices would rapidly drift if not corrected for time contraction relative to the Earth’s surface where gravity is stronger.
Anyway the upshot of this real phenomena is that it is entirely possible that billions of years has transpired way out in the farthest reaches of space in the same time that a few normal Earth days or weeks or years have passed here on Earth. This is but one possible explanation for the starlight time travel problem. I don’t know what new discoveries will uncover in the future, but I see no reason to abandon the Authority of the Holy Bible in favour of ‘Deep Time’ or ‘Evolution’ for that matter, as they are clearly in error as far as I am concerned.

There are a lot of very intelligent Christian men and women working in a broad range of scientific endeavour who would disagree with your statements. Yes, you have the numbers on your side, but this is not about the most popular belief, it is about the TRUTH.
As Jesus said, 12 Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. 13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: 14 Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Matthew 7:12-14

If you disagree, then so be it, that is your right and your choice.

God Bless,
jon

This is one neat trick to ensure your followers never learn about all the evidence that contradicts one’s worldview. It’s borderline lazy as well- i don’t just tell my students “oh don’t listen to Answers in Genesis they are false teachers,” but I outline what the evidence is and how, in my opinion, is utterly incompatible with a YEC view. Unfortunately you, @Burrawang , seem to be trapped. It is amazing that there are still people that claim:

This statement is definitely false on many accounts and we’ve known this for hundreds of years. But because you follow people like the video, you are currently limited in what you learn and understand.

Ironically to believe YEC you must believe his laws and constants aren’t actually constant. For example, pretty much all YEC claim that radiometric decay rates were sped up by factors of billions, and the massive excess heat generated via condensing billions of years of decay into a single year magically disappears.

Do you believe the second question follows from the first? Because it definitely doesn’t have to. You can believe the first and be fine with evolution.

7 Likes

Just saying. The Bible teaches a flat earth with a dome over it. Show me where the Bible , written by men inspired by the Holy Spirit says there is no dome or the world is a globe?

3 Likes

Well let’s just do the maths to see how intense that gravitational well would have to be, shall we?

Let’s just take the lowest rungs of the cosmic distance ladder. So, for example, things such as Cepheid variables and the SN1987A supernova. That takes you up to about 20 million light years. There are other galaxies a thousand times more distant than that, so already we’re being generous.

To compress 20 million years of light travel time into just six thousand, you would need a time dilation – so a Lorenz factor – of about three thousand. The Lorenz factor is, of course, given by

\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}

Let’s consider what that looks like in the vicinity of a black hole. Gravitational time dilation is given by:

t_0 = t_f \sqrt{1 - \frac{r_s}{r}}

So in other words,

6000 \approx 20000000 \sqrt{1 - \frac{r_s}{r}}

Or,

1 - \frac{r_s}{r} = \frac {r - r_s} r \approx \frac 1 {11,111,111}

In other words, you will get the time dilation that you need at a distance from the event horizon of a black hole equal to one eleven millionth of its radius.

One of the largest known black holes in the universe is TON 618, with a mass of roughly 66 billion solar masses and a Schwarzschild radius of about 1,300 astronomical units or 195 billion km. At that distance, you’re talking about the Earth being just 20,000 km or one and a half times its diameter away from the event horizon.

And bear in mind that that’s just the nearest galaxies out to about 20 million light years. There are some galaxies a thousand times more distant than that. Accommodating these would need us to be a million times closer to the event horizon of TON 618 than that.

You see, it’s easy to hand wave about being in the general vicinity of a humungous gravitational well, or about nuclear decay rates being accelerated by a billion fold during the Flood, but once you start doing the maths to see what that would actually look like in reality, it’s a completely different story.

This is what separates science from pseudoscience and rhetoric. Pseudoscience and rhetoric just name drops scientific concepts and hand-waves about them and hopes that nobody notices. Real science actually sits down and does the maths.

2 Likes

Dear Matthew,
I believe no such thing.
I am aware that the RATE project published some findings from their in depth research, but accelerated radiometric decay rates was proposed as a possibility, but was as far as I am aware, by no means explained as to how this could occur without the excessive heat.

What I do know is that 14C is found intrinsic within diamonds purported to be hundreds of millions of years old. And before you claim contamination, no contamination was ruled out by following standard procedure to avoid as best possible any contamination of the samples.
I strongly suggest that you read the articles on this at:

AND

AND

AND

Well to politely answer your question, yes I believe that the Holy Bible is the infallible Word of God, and i also believe that Adam and Eve were real people that were created directly by God.

Sadly it appears you believe in the man made naturalistic philosophy of evolution instead of the ever so clear text that’s Inspired by God as the reality written in the Holy Bible for our edification.

God Bless,
jon

I believe YEC ‘science’ is ultimately about invoking millions of miracles that precisely mimic the appearance of great age, but which cannot be admitted for some reason.

2 Likes

No, contamination has not been ruled out. To claim that it has is to grossly (and perhaps even wilfully) misunderstand the most basic and elementary principles of how measurement works in every area of science, whether you divide it up into “operational” and “historical” science or not.

It is impossible to eliminate contamination entirely. The best that you can do is to reduce it; over and above that, standard procedure must quantify it.

The measured levels of carbon-14 in diamonds are simply too low to rule out contamination. Young earthists might have a case if they could show that carbon-14 levels never fell below about 10% modern carbon or so, with little or no variation from one geographical area or one environmental setting to the next. In reality, measured levels vary widely and can go right down to as low as we can measure known and well studied contamination levels – 0.01% modern carbon or less.

This is just another example of the young earthist trope of tiny samples with huge error bars being held up as “overwhelming” evidence that hundreds of thousands of much more significant samples with much tighter error bars must be out by a factor of a million. Accurate and honest measurement as demanded by the Bible itself does not work that way, and neither does anything else for that matter.

6 Likes

So, I pulled up the Talk.Origin page to see how what was ‘rebutted’ in the CRI articles compared the the source.

Diamond

Diamond is difficult to combust. The RATE samples apparently required modifications to the normal procedure [1], presumably higher combustion temperatures and longer combustion times, likely increasing the sample chemistry contamination. The samples were reportedly pitted and may have been subjected to previous analyses and to unknown contamination. Nevertheless, RATE’s five deep-mine diamond samples had radiocarbon levels only slightly above background (0.01 to 0.07 pMC after background subtraction), while the seven alluvial samples ranged from 0.03 to 0.31 pMC after background subtraction.

Subsequently, the RATE team inserted diamond directly into an ion source, eliminating the sample chemistry, and measured much lower radiocarbon values, “between 0.008 and 0.022 pMC, with a mean value of 0.014 pMC,” apparently with no background subtraction [6]. This much lower value for unprocessed diamond provides strong evidence that their processed diamond samples had been contaminated, most likely by the modified sample chemistry.

Taylor and Southon have also measured unprocessed diamond, finding a similar range of 0.005 to 0.03 pMC without background subtraction. They interpret this result as their instrument background, primarily due to ion source memory. Their ion source current varied, unintentionally, over about a factor of two, perhaps due to crystal face orientation or to conductivity differences between samples. “The oldest 14C age equivalents were measured on natural diamonds which exhibited the highest current yields” [4]. This important observation provides evidence about the source of the radiocarbon.

If the radiocarbon were intrinsic to the sample, there would be no change in the radiocarbon ratio with sample current. The 14C, 13C, and 12C would change in unison. However, if the radiocarbon were coming from ion source memory or elsewhere in the accelerator, it should give a count rate independent of ion source current. Normalizing the radiocarbon count rate to the ion source current, which is predominantly 12C, would result in higher radiocarbon content for lower source currents, as observed. This data provides clear evidence that at least a significant fraction of the radiocarbon detected by Taylor and Southon in diamond measurements did not come from the diamonds themselves and thus could not be “intrinsic radiocarbon.”

The lower values for unprocessed diamond and the current-dependent behavior find no explanation in Baumgardner’s “intrinsic radiocarbon” model. But these results fit well with the Taylor and Southon evidence that instrument background (specifically ion source memory) is material-dependent, with diamond exhibiting significantly less ion source memory than graphite. The radiocarbon detected in natural, unprocessed diamond measurements seems to be nothing more than instrument background.

Did I miss the CRI discussion about ion source current?

2 Likes

Dear James,
If you want to know more about what I was referring to, the 2006 Sloan Digital Sky Survey was a mammoth effort around the globe at many participating observatories. From that survey and including Carmelli cosmology, the Christian Astrophysicist Dr John Hartnett proposed a possible explanation for the starlight time travel question.

I suggest that you read the paper titled:

Testing Cosmological General Relativity against high redshift observations

at:

and then it would be useful to read the paper titled:

Properties of gravitational waves in Cosmological General Relativity

at:

and then read the paper titled:

Finite bounded expanding white hole universe without dark matter

at:

and then you would likely benefit from reading the article titled:

Does observational evidence indicate the universe is expanding?—part 1: the case for time dilation

at:
https://creation.com/expanding-universe-1
followed by the article titled:

Does observational evidence indicate the universe is expanding?—part 2: the case against expansion

at:
https://creation.com/expanding-universe-2
followed by the article titled:

A creationist cosmology in a galactocentric universe

at:
https://creation.com/galactocentric-cosmology

God Bless,
jon

Dear James,
you can believe whatever you wish; as that is your right and is your free choice.

I wholeheartedly disagree with your words that rail against what the Holy Bible teaches us.

I choose of my own free will to believe the Holy Bible as the inerrant Authoritative source of Truth and how I should live my life, fearing God, Who is All Powerful, All Knowing and Who Loves us all.
The very nature of the noble endeavour of science to understand how God’s beautiful creation operates is a joy and is confirming more and more, the brilliant genius of God.

The more I learn about nano technology of biological systems at sub cellular scales, the more amazed I am at how wonderfully we are all made.

There are many things we still don’t know, some we may never know.

Science has limitations as you should be well aware, but it is more than anything else, the ‘Worldview’ that a person holds to that will dictate how they will interpret the same piece of evidence as another with a disparate worldview.

God Bless,
jon

Geophysicist Dr John Baumgardner, part of the RATE research group,6 investigated 14C in a number of diamonds.7 There should be no 14C at all if they really were over a billion years old, yet the radiocarbon lab reported that there was over 10 times the detection limit. Thus they had a radiocarbon ‘age’ far less than a million years! Dr Baumgardner repeated this with six more alluvial diamonds from Namibia, and these had even more radiocarbon.

God Bless,
jon

I’m sorry Jon, but this is nothing whatsoever to do with “railing against what the Holy Bible teaches us.” This is about honest reporting and honest interpretation of accurate information, which is what the Holy Bible itself demands. Nothing more, nothing less.

You’re entitled to your own opinion. Everybody is entitled to their own opinion. But nobody is entitled to their own facts. It is a fact, not an opinion, that honest reporting and honest interpretation of accurate information has rules. It is a fact, not an opinion, that one of those rules is that you cannot overturn large numbers of high quality, high-precision measurements with a handful of low quality, low precision ones. And it is a fact, not an opinion, that the quality of a measurement is determined by the size of its error bars.

It’s as simple as this, Jon. If you want to challenge a scientific theory, including evolution or deep geological time, you need to stick to the rules. Accusing people of “railing against the Holy Bible” for demanding that you stick to the rules is spiritual blackmail.

6 Likes

Those articles reference info from the early 2000’s.

Regarding the detection of time dilation with quasars ~20 years later:

In Nature Astronomy journal:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-023-02029-2

I located this info Googling ‘time dilation quasars’.

2 Likes

Dear James,
no body is disputing the measurements of the highly accurate instruments as far as I am aware. But as you would very well know, the instruments do not provide an age at all, they only provide a mass of the element isotope being analysed for.

The interpretation that x mass = n years is based more on philosophy than it is on empirical measurement of age, simply because there is absolutely no irrefutable way to accurately calibrate your equations that convert an elemental isotope concentration in a sample into an age in years. To do that you need to have a preconceived idea of the age you are testing for.
If the isotope percentage in the sample returns an age that is too young or too old for the preconceived belief of the age, it is discarded as unreliable or contaminated, just as you are doing here regarding the 14C found within diamonds. I’m sure you will disagree.
Of course there are rules and proper lab protocols and procedures to be strictly followed, that is a given always.

Anyway, as I stated previously, you are welcome to believe whatever you wish, as am I.

God Bless,
jon

It feels like ‘Biblical Scientism’. Perhaps an oxymoron, but it has that vibe, a kind of tension that can arise when one’s certainties are in fragile position.

To be honest, I think we all have some less than rational core precepts about the world in which we are emotionally invested and need for them to feel certain. I know I’ve confronted a few in my life, over the years, so there are probably more

4 Likes

Derek Lowe has a long running blog that is, I think, read widely by many in the drug discovery fields: In the Pipeline

He has a recent post that really interested me. It discusses a bit about being weird, science and how we come to terms with uncertainty in our scientific careers.
https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/praise-weirdness

Dear Argon and James,
no one is attempting to blackmail anyone.
The Holy Bible is clear and concise about the creation and the Global Flood.

The myths of ‘deep time’ and ‘evolution’ are deceptions that have already, and continue to, lead many good people away from the faith. Unfortunately, that is the real heart of the matter.

The whole erroneous concept of death before Adam’s sin is ever so profoundly stark that I marvel at how can people who identify as Christians, actually believe such illogical heresy.
That false belief alone makes a mockery of the very reason why our Loving Creator and Saviour graciously humbled Himself as a servant and allowed men full of evil and malice toward Him, put Him to death on that Roman cross, to provide a way that we could ALL be reconciled to Him.

There are truly ‘wolves in sheep’s clothing’ among us and they are deceiving many.
Christians need to unite and stand against the evil deceptions of ‘deep time’ and ‘evolution’.

God Bless,
jon

The false prophets are the ones whose predictions do not come to pass. It is the predictions of the creationists which fail over and over again and it is the predictions of science which agrees with new evidence over and over again.

3 Likes
  • At about 23:30 in Calvin Smith’s “powerful video”, he quotes the atheist William Provine:
    "No wonder the atheist William Provine once commented, “One can have a religious view that is compatible with evolution only if the religious view is indistinguishable atheism.”
  • Excuse me, that’s some mighty fine echo-logic, borrowing an atheist’s reasoning to hear your own belief repeated.
  • “I believe X. Here’s someone else who believes X. Therefore, X is true.”
3 Likes

Then show me some living, breathing, soft tissue on public display in zoos. I will take big dinosaurs or small, or any permian creature. You have hundreds to chose from, even at the level of genus. If they descended off the ark 4500 years ago, you should be able to fetch several. Or you could invent silly excuses as to why all these animals at lower levels of the fossil record, despite having no particular common association, went extinct. How convenient. That AiG just makes stuff up is evident to anyone - you do not need to be a trained scientist, although that makes matters worse for YEC.

There is no question to solve. That light has crossed the distance of the visible universe measured in lightYEARS presents no scientific problem. It is what it is. If it isn’t broke, it doesn’t need a fix.

Nothing at all is explained. Not the alteration of fundamental force which would lead to accelerated decay, not the inescapable and lethal dosage of radiation which would ensue, and of course, not the white heat from the energy release. Accelerated decay did not happen, and radiometric dating correlates well with other age proxies.

That is flat out false witness. If 14C has ever been found in diamond, show us the lab report. Not the YEC article nor the slandered calibration research paper - show the supposed lab report. It does not exist, because measurable intrinsic 14C in diamonds has never been demonstrated (even allowing for underground spallation). Baumgardner has never released any lab report. Nothing.

Your problem is there are many things we do know. Just because a fact is inconvenient to your theology does not make it suspect.

3 Likes