Story summary:
Church started to grow, believers shared their possesions with each other, and so a couple decided to sell part of their land and donate the money to the Christian community, however, they lied how much they received from it and stated they gave it all to the church when in truth, they kept part of it to themselves. It was done to get praise from other people, and Peter the Apostle saw through their deceit and accused first Anabias, then Sapphire of lying to Holy Spirit, which caused their instant death.
While this story has itās merits, and for sure shows how important it is to not go for praise but be a humble servant of God, I canāt accept it as authentic. The same as with Job, I understand the lesson from the book, but I canāt accept that God really let his children die while later giving him more children as a remedy. And thatās okay, Job is quite obviously a theological argument in form of a story, this chapter though, claims itself to be a genuine story ( telling history of early christianity and all ) and because of that, I have to see this story as a way to show Peter authority, or importance of keeping true to Holy Spirit, not really what happened. Just as two different genealogies of Jesus were created to show Jesusās uniqueness.
Wait a second, isnāt that cherry picking? If I just say this story is fiction, then I can just tell every story that I donāt like to be a fiction and the one I accept as real. And this is a fair point. But there are reasons to doubt this story other than āI just donāt like itā. Jesus was really a forgiving person, once and once again he showed mercy to people that others thought of as deserving of death and promoted that fellow believers should instead help one another and strengthten each otherās faith instead of condemning.
Peter couldāve just rebuke them or/and exorcize the demon out of Anabias if it caused the problem. Instead he just killed a fellow Christian even though all of us make mistakes, even more, Peter himself rejected Jesus in spite of his promises ( and yes, he saw his mistake, but if he couldāve repent then why he took this opportunity from Anabias and Sapphire ), and Jesus didnāt just slain him after he was resurrected right there and then, so it just seems to be out of character for Peter and out of character for God to follow through with Peterās judgement.
Yes, there is Matthew 12:31 āAll manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men; but the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit shall not be forgiven unto menā.
But I see it as rather sin that refuses forgiveness, if you undermine the mission of Jesus and say for example that his death did nothing and wonāt save you, then obviously you flatly reject the forgiveness making it impossible to achieve relationship with God, making it a mortal sin. I didnāt for once see it as something that you need to be killed immediately after doing.
Those are my thoughts about it, feel free to correct me if Iām wrong.