An argument I need help analyzing

[Vinnie]

@BuffaloMax17

In one short clip, Dave calls a God that needs to intervene “lame,” referring to claims that evolution is inferior to creationism. Here is that video:

@BuffaloMax17

what are your thoughts in this?

That angry Dave and even many Christians today have a poor understanding of God theologically. This thread provides some answers:

Primary and Secondary Causes, God through (not vs) Nature, and Gaps are scraps. (Aristotle and Aquinas and Cosmological arguments)

I just wanted to comment on these and start a new discussion pointing out what a lot of us really mean by saying God is the primary cause of all things. I am not a philosopher but will ltry my best to lay out some complex metaphysics that I think answers both questions. From Aquinas we get the idea of Primary vs Secondary Causes. God is not an intervener in nature but the sustainer. This is why I find arguing from gaps (where God supposedly goes beyond how he normally sustains things) to esse…